Give me Liberty over Safety any day....
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
~Benjamin Franklin, in the Penn. Assembly - Reply To Governor
Live Free Or Die; Death Is Not The Worst of Evils.
~General Stark sent this toast to be read at the reunion, he was too ill to attend;
"Live Free or Die" became the New Hampshire State Motto in 1945
-General John Stark, a toast for the 32nd anniversary reunion of the 1777 Battle of Bennington in Vermont, July 31, 1809
2007-07-02 12:36:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by Kate 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
I wonder if you realize that this has more potential context than choosing between wiretapping or terrorism.
There is also the tradeoff of Social Security versus economic freedom, seatbelt and helmet laws, universal healthcare, and the list goes on and on.
Are there certain kinds of Security that you value more than the attendant price of Liberty? Or are you a single-issue philosophical poser?
2007-07-02 15:42:09
·
answer #2
·
answered by open4one 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
With Muslims in charge...you'll get NEITHER...even if you pay tribute to be left alive, they can change their minds or what's left of them...
Thomas Jefferson advocated a just and speedy trial...of TWO WHOLE WEEKS...with 1/2 of worldly goods of perp going to victim's family and a hanging for the purpetrator on Monday...never on a Sunday!
No Kidding!
2007-07-02 12:11:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by acct10132002 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
that's no longer an extremely reliable website to get your info from...that's the kind of place the place stupid human beings tend to collect to transform impressionable minds to their stupidity...you're able to run into the occasional guy or woman of the two party who's actual smart, yet those everybody is few and lots between. the typical concepts of the democratic party may well be defined as socially and economically liberal - they think that business company might desire to be regulated to sell the welfare of the human beings, and that persons might desire to have the perfect to do as they choose with their bodies - which skill they help gay marriage rights, the girl's option to have an abortion, etc. The Republican party is largely the different - socially and economically conservative - they think interior the ability of the unfastened industry equipment without regulation, and so as that they think abortion might desire to be outlawed. The greater religious Republicans - no longer all of them are, yet there honestly are loads of them - additionally believe that marriage might desire to be strictly between a guy and a woman. those are in basic terms the hassle-free aspects of it - it gets greater complicated. you apart from mght might desire to comprehend that there are stupid liberals and stupid conservatives - exceedingly in this website. no rely what side you're on, do no longer turn a blind eye to the stupidity of your party - because of the fact they the two have loads of soil on their names. in my view, I actual tend to be in simple terms approximately libertarian - economically conservative and socially liberal - and that i think of the two the Democrats and the Republicans are a gaggle of idiots, exceedingly the politicians working the practice. And a observe of advice - don't get sucked up into the rut of attempting to attain factors on the different party, and PLEASE do no longer make generalizations. EDIT: there is an answer under me (jsmrt?) it relatively is so heavily biased i might desire to vomit...
2016-10-03 10:48:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree with Ben. I am all for sacrificing security and dying for my right to liberty.
2007-07-02 11:51:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by trustme_imascientist 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
safety
2007-07-02 13:27:32
·
answer #6
·
answered by Gardenia 6
·
0⤊
2⤋