How many "just a theory"'s were used in landing a man on the moon?

Question

In thinking about the computer for the spacecraft, I can think of: algorithmic data theory / systems theory, control circuit theory, signal circuit theory, ... I'll stop...

Answer 1

Well, it is an unscientifically proven fact that man did not land on the moon. The American flag is flapping in the breeze, there are no stars in the sky and so on. So, the fact that man did not land on the moon proves that all those theories were false and therefore evolution is also false and the moon is made out of green cheese and the earth is flat.

Answer 2

There are people who believe none of it has ever happened, they are just staging it all on a sound stage, man never walked on the moon and the space shuttles do not go into space and come back.

I've see a space shuttle land at Edwards Air Force Base so I know that they exist but have no way of know for where they been.

Answer 3

Man landing on the moon = observable
Theories behind man landing on the moon = testable
Fairy tale of evolution = assumptions and circumstantial evidence

Either change the definition of "theory" or stop calling the fairy tale of evolution a theory.

Answer 4

And why is it that we've never gone back? It's all a matter of our gov't racing against Russia's to be the first to put a man on the moon, so what else do you do but fake it 'til you make it?

Answer 5

The moon landings were obvious hoaxes staged by the Atheist/Commie/Satanist Conspiracy.

Answer 6

They used a monkey first.

Answer 7

What's scarier is that you have more computer power in your pc than they had on that whole spaceship.

Answer 8

The first (ie: fake) time or the subsequent (real) times?

*giggle*

Answer 9

None.

If we lived by that, mankind would still be living in caves.