She's the quitessential attention whore who will say anything for a dollar. Her facts are always wrong and if people try to point it out to her, she changes the topic. In a way she's the perfect symbol for the Republican party: a vaguely attractive, but venomous, ignorant, anorexic neoc*nt.
2007-07-01 23:42:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by Belzetot 5
·
7⤊
4⤋
She's way beyond moonbat, a moonbat doesn't normally have such reactionary vitriol.
Why don't the paparazzi follow her and take pictures of her on her own time. They could capture her goose-stepping in jackboots, and put that on the tabloid front pages.
2007-07-02 18:21:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by Iain G 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
wow such hatred. Again I see a lot of accusation's tossed around that none of her facts are true but no proof. She really gets under your liberal thin skins doesn't she lol And by the way Rush has more truth in an hour of one of his daily 3 hour radio shows then all the liberal hot air I hear in a year. Remember Hillary a few years ago on national tv saying that her husband (the president at that time) was guilty of nothing and the whole lying under oath and the what is the meaning of is stuff was a right wing conspiracy? Opps sorry for bringing up some old real facts. If Ann and Rush are so wrong then why do they have best selling books and why does Rush have an audiance of millions and not one liberal talk show host has ever been able to compete with him in the arena of ideas? I guess you all hate Fox news also? The only news show that gives both sides and they are no1 also. You say you are the party of tollerence and fairness yet can't stand it when someone disagrees with you. Hey peeps I love you all and wish you the best but you sure are hard to tolerate sometimes lol
2007-07-02 06:59:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by crusinthru 6
·
1⤊
5⤋
Journalists from the extreme right know what they are doing. They are firstly defining the boundaries of reasonable debate (actually a important function in a democracy) and by doing this - they are actually making society more civilised.
The people who believe what these folks say - and take them seriously are the actual moonbats.
2007-07-02 06:54:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
Yes and yes.
She has the right, of course, to say what she wants to. The problem with her is that she attacks people and not issues, so she fails to further her cause or be credible. She is not so much a political commentator as she is a diversion from political commentary. Her opinions should be resigned to the tabloids.
2007-07-02 07:02:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by Myles D 6
·
3⤊
2⤋
She like Rush and others of that ilk (both sides) must be in it for the money, the modern day snake oil salesmen/woman.
2007-07-02 06:43:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by madjer21755 5
·
5⤊
0⤋
I love Ann Coulter because she is what's representative of Republican women.
We all know at heart that she's a real sweetie and would like nothing better than to sit on the front porch drinking ice tea, and shelling peas while contemplating whether all Democrats might be *******.
thanks
2007-07-02 06:50:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by telwidit 5
·
1⤊
6⤋
Of course she does. Personally she is a certified nut case.
2007-07-02 07:34:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by independant_009 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
I thought the term "moon-bat" was used to refer to the left.
But I am sure she believes what she says as much as Stewart Smally does.
2007-07-02 06:43:26
·
answer #9
·
answered by Dina W 6
·
4⤊
1⤋
She obviously didn't get enough attention as a child.
Nor did she learn any manners.
Why do people pay attention to people like her?
2007-07-02 06:45:35
·
answer #10
·
answered by Dastardly 6
·
6⤊
2⤋