My gut feeling is energy....but that is just me.
2007-07-03 15:52:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
What is it in a black hole? You mean what is in a black hole? Everybody guesses what happens after matter has been taken into a black hole, and voila, nothing is seen except darkness, blackness, nothingness. Hawkins reckons that residual radiation does escape the pull of the hole. This we've got to see!
Consider black matter (could well be anti-matter). The Black Hole does a dry cleaning service clearing up all the clutter of meandering matter around and transforms it into its opposite...anti matter. And after its done its job 'nothing beside remains.' Much like an odd job man who finishes his job and packs up his tools and leaves the scene.
What is the point of black or anti-matter. Does it expand the universe by pushing and shoving it from the inside (read that somewhere); or does it simultaneously pull the universe at its outer fringes?
2007-07-02 08:21:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by virtrava 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No one has ever seen past the event horizon of a black hole
this is because even light goes in and dont come back out
My theory is that the antimatter during the creation of the universe formed into black holes to keep it from our type
of matter.
The massive almost infinite mass blackholes then swept
the dust and matter outwards and is why we see a blackhole
in every galaxy (not solar system)
I imagine the center of a black hole to be more of a
frozen piece of time than it is matter
Time does slow down in the presence of gravity
and boy it there gravity there
2007-07-02 06:04:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Black holes. These are said to be like gigantic cosmic whirlpools from which nothing can escape. The inward pull of gravity is so strong that both light and matter that get too close are inexorably sucked into them.
No black hole has ever been observed directly-by definition that is impossible-although physicists hope to demonstrate the existence of them by the effect they have on neighboring objects. New observing techniques may be needed to unlock this particular secret.
PRESENT scientific understanding is that stars shine because of a ceaseless struggle between gravity and nuclear forces. Without gravity to squeeze the gas deep inside the star, nuclear fusion could not take place. On the other hand, without nuclear fusion to resist the pull of gravity, some very strange things can happen to stars.
Scientists believe that when stars about the size of our sun exhaust their nuclear fuel of hydrogen and helium, gravity squeezes them down to hot cinders about the size of the earth, called white dwarfs. A white dwarf may contain as much mass as the sun, but its mass is crammed into a space a million times smaller.
You can think of ordinary matter as mostly empty space, with almost all the mass of each atom located in a tiny nucleus surrounded by a much larger cloud of electrons. But inside a white dwarf, gravity squeezes the electron cloud into a tiny fraction of its previous volume, shrinking the star to the size of a planet. For stars about the size of our sun, at this point there is a standoff between gravity and forces possessed by the electrons, preventing any further compression.
But what of stars heavier than the sun, with more gravity? For stars more than 1.4 times as massive as the sun, the force of gravity is so great that the electron cloud is squeezed out of existence. The protons and electrons then combine into neutrons. The neutrons resist further squeezing, provided the gravity is not too strong. Instead of a white dwarf the size of a planet, the result is a neutron star the size of a small asteroid. Neutron stars consist of the densest known material in the universe.
What, though, if the gravity is further increased? Scientists believe that in stars about three times the mass of the sun, the gravity is too strong for the neutrons to withstand. No form of matter known to physicists can resist the cumulative force of all this gravity. It seems that the asteroid-size ball of neutrons would get squeezed not just into a smaller ball but into nothing, into a point called a singularity, or some other as yet undescribed theoretical entity. The star would apparently disappear, leaving behind only its gravity and a black hole where it used to be. The black hole would form a gravitational shadow in place of the former star. It would be a region in which gravity was so strong that nothing-not even light-could escape.
2007-07-02 06:06:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by Obetpogi 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
If a black hole could exist there would be nothing inside of a black hole,not even space.
Anything that crossed the event horizon would be pressed into non-existence.
Space is required for the existence of anything.
2007-07-02 07:19:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by Billy Butthead 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
A black hole is made up of gravity, very strong gravity, so strong that light cannot escape.
I would assume that there would have to be some end to a black hole.
2007-07-02 21:25:38
·
answer #6
·
answered by polluxgirl14 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
no one knows. some believe that everything is destroyed inside, but some believe that there could be white holes elsewhere in the universe that releases the things that are caught by the black hole. there is even guesswork that they lead to other universes!
2007-07-02 05:57:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by Sid 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Everything and Nothing . As it sucks in more mass it gets more massive and attraction increases . So radius decreases.
2007-07-02 07:04:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by bua 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
some black love
2007-07-02 06:07:24
·
answer #9
·
answered by cpc26ca 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Neutrons so tightly packed together there is no time or space within it, what goes in stays in.
2007-07-04 11:04:09
·
answer #10
·
answered by johnandeileen2000 7
·
0⤊
0⤋