Do you think the guy that was on fire should have been treated for his injuries by the NHS, or left in a corner to die, as ultimately thats what he wanted. Theres a big enough waiting list without treating people like this, his actions could have killed hundreds of innocent people. I believe we need to severely punish these people as a deterrent. Serious answers only please.
2007-07-01 21:54:39 · 29 answers · asked by Annie M 6 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
No he should not have been treated by our NHS They should of sent him back to his own country, to be treated in his own hospital, And so what if he died on the way. ENOCH POWELL WAS RIGHT
2007-07-01 23:32:45 · answer #1 · answered by survivor 3 · 4⤊ 3⤋
What it showed the World - is that they should do what the Scottish people done - and not take any crap from these Islamic Terrorists.. Well done to the bystanders who helped the Police take out the Glasgow Airport maniacs..Personally I think they should have let them burn a wee bit longer - but no doubt they would have had a freebie human rights lawyer looking for compensation.. Lock them up in Barlinnie amongst the other cons ...no special treatment like they gave that Pan Am bomber.. they would soon be begging for mercy.
2007-07-01 23:08:25 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
I'm sure he won't be getting the most sympathetic treatment do you? If I was a nurse and instructed to inject him with morphine ever 4 hours for the pain you could rest assured I'd be squirting it down the sink and ticking the drug sheet.
Then maybe thats why I'm not a nurse?
I do think he should be treated and kept alive - he wanted to die remember. Giving his life was the ultimate gift he could give as far as he was concerned. We are denying him of what he thinks is his purpose in life. He is also party to information that the police and security services need.
2007-07-01 23:55:12 · answer #3 · answered by Lovely Lady 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
And since that's what he wanted, it's far better to keep him alive, get every bit of information out of him that's even remotely interesting, then make sure he's well and truly healed and throw him in a cell. Since he wanted to die, the most suitable punishment is keeping him alive for as long as physically possible.
And as I've said before on other answers, we keep the little b@stard alive for two reasons.
1. Dead men don't have much to say to anyone.
2. Letting him die would make us as bad as him. Sod that.
2007-07-05 21:54:15 · answer #4 · answered by Beastie 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
While I wholeheartedly sympathise and am keen to agree with your viewpoint; would we not be better showing the world that we are a civilised and evolved society with the human compassion and level headedness that can help us rise above this kind of barbaric action?
If I was at the airport watching this guy burning, I probably would have put the boot in myself. But then I cant help thinking that we need to do the opposite, the violence is a cycle, it’s unending.
Our nation seems hell bent on perpetuating the violence by continuing our brutal and exploitative occupation of the middle east.
I don’t have answers, only ideas.
2007-07-01 22:13:45 · answer #5 · answered by loathsomedog 3 · 4⤊ 1⤋
he should not have been offered NHS treatment the little mutherfucker. anyone that does anything to put someone's life at risk should be put into prison for life and left to rot. at least that way they would be suffering for what they did as death is the easy way out. as he wanted to die, he has not payed the price for what he nearly did to hundreds of innocent people. it is disgraceful how many terrorists we have in the world now.
2007-07-03 02:07:31 · answer #6 · answered by steph 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i wonder why this guy wanted to kill himself ?and hurt people in this country and all i can think of is the middle east especially whats going on in palestine (well its called israel) now but i call it palestine the real name ,why doesnt our news tell us whats really going on over there, i will tell you the israelis are making life terrible for the palestinans knocking houses down with bulldozers ,killing innocent people everyday for no reason it totally unacceptable and the u.k and america are backing israel to do this thats why we are a target,why on our news all we ever see is suicide bomber this suicide bomber that ,yet one israeli gets a hair knocked out of place and its the main headline on news,you dont hear out about women & children blew to bits by helicopter gunships because a few kids were throwing stones
2007-07-02 13:22:47 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Shooting the bomber in the head on Live TV would have been the best way forward.
If he was shot, it would not have been a suicide, and therefore a win, to us.
We do not need to know who they were working with - under the eyes of the law they were guilty - so destroy them, its the only way to ensure that that person does nothing worse in the future.
2007-07-01 22:42:56 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
they should have left him to die,but at the same time made sure he suffered the pain,he wanted to inflict on others,they saved him, so he will do this again when he recovers and is release from jail,if he gets that far,because people that do things like trying to blow others up and kill them as well as themselves must be really sick in the head
2007-07-03 10:19:01 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, I think we should keep him alive as a deterrent to others. However (I'm not that nice) I do not think he should have any pain relief at all, and as anyone who has ever burnt themselves on the oven knows burns bloody hurt so hopefully this guy will be awake and in agony. Oh the joy!
2007-07-01 22:08:37 · answer #10 · answered by Mrs M 4 · 6⤊ 1⤋
If he wanted to die, then not letting him is a punishment, no?
The point about not lettting him be a martyr is a good one.
The mark of a civilised society is to treat everyone with respect. If someone is on fire, we help them, even if we do hate them. When he has recovered he will face a court and get punishment.
2007-07-01 22:08:18 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋