If you were president of Iran, and you had the same morals you have right now, would you hand a nuke to a terrorist to nuke America? Please consider the following facts in your decision:
1. The american president has agreed that nuking your country to deprive you of nuclear capability is an option.
2. America helped fund a brutal war on your people be the Iraqis, killing 1 million people in the 1980's, turned a blind eye to the use of biological and chemical weapons. Your country is the second most affected country by biological weapons.
3. America now occupies your two neighbors, who they took control of by force, increasing instability in the region.
4. America is currently detaining hundreds of people illegally, without charging them with anything, for an undetermined amount of time(currently 3-4 years)
In closing I am not a islamic fundementalist. I am a white, university student, living in Canada, with plans to move to America. What would you do as president or Iran?
2007-07-01
18:00:09
·
27 answers
·
asked by
will H
2
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
I forgot to add a crucial detail. The american president bit is just in case Rudy Giuliani becomes president. He said during the republican debates he wouldn't take nuking iran off the table, to eliminate nuclear capability.
2007-07-01
18:04:42 ·
update #1
I wouldn't nuke America either. The killing of millions of innocent americans wouldn't accomplish anything. I can understand why the president of Iran hates america though.
2007-07-01
21:10:11 ·
update #2
No, i would not start a nuclear war, even if my country was attacked first, that way the world will find out the truth about my claim of using nuclear power to provide energy only.
Best Regards.
2007-07-01 18:16:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
It depends if you mean nuking America as the nation of Iran, formally attacking the US or giving a nuke to Al Queda and having them put it into a cargo container and ship it to Long Beach or the Port of New York. Either way, it would be stupid.
1. If it is done in retaliation for an attack, the US will know what nation to turn into radioactive glass.
2. If it is handed over to Al Queda and used, you must remember that every radioactive isotope has a signature, a finger print if you will. Very quickly it will be discovered where the bomb was produced (N.Korea or Iran) and for that result see item 1.
3. If (or when) they get the bomb, they would be better served to not waste the single shot they have in their little cap pistol. It would be far more valuable for sabre rattling and impressing the easily impressed people in the region.
4. If they were stupid enough to hand one of these nukes to Al Queda, Israel would probably bomb them in a pre-emptive strike the moment they heard about it. Their country would be flattened and it would take months to produce another warhead.
So, no. Iran would not use a nuke if they should manage to make one. Even if we were to invade them and defeat their army, they would not want to let THAT tiger out of the gage. Not unless they wish to perish as a race.
To answer the question you asked at the end, if I were president of Iran, I would surprise the world and halt the war in the Middle East by embracing Israel. I'd invite the US and Israel to join with me in "leaning on" Syria and any other country that is supplying troops, bombs, bullets or beans to the insurgents. I would double my nation's standard of living by cooperating with the west, who would surely make it "worth while" to my countrymen. I would still continue strive to become "top dog" in the area, but I'd do it as a friend of peace and humanity. I'd realize that the world feeds itself with oil. If the world finds a new source (and they're working hard on doing just that) I'd realize that if we are too troublesome to deal with, the world will take its business elsewhere.
2007-07-01 18:42:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by Don S 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Since you said that I have the same morals I have right now, I don't have to read any further. To my way of thinking, there could never be anything that could ever justify nuking any country, no matter how corrupt their government might be.
And, yes I am aware that our government has become one of the most corrupt governments in the world..but the government and the people are two different things, and the more corrupt a government gets, the more that government lies to its people. The majority of our country's people are good people, it is just that too many of them are ill-informed! *sm*
2007-07-01 18:25:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by LadyZania 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The President of Iran would have to realize that nuking America would result in the complete annhiliation of Iran, which would make him president of a pile of radioactive middle eastern rubble. Ahmadinejad would have to consider this along with the facts you presented. If I were Ahmadinejad, I wouldn't even consider such a thing, but I am not, and he might not think as rationally as I do.
Welcome to America! Now go home.
2007-07-01 18:14:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by toptuner1 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
i'm hoping that the U. S. does blanket Iran with Nuclear weapons, and Russia, and each mohammedan united states with it ! i'm no longer afraid that The Russians will use Nuclear weapons on US because of the fact their Nuclear weapons are out dated, and in simple terms approximately ineffective, they're greater risky to them than they're to US. I additionally do no longer challenge with regard to the international being destroyed in a Nuclear warfare, it won't ensue, guy will in no way smash the international, guy can no longer smash the international. in basic terms God can, and he will, without help from guy. yet, to be relatively honest, i do no longer believe that the U. S. is approximately to attack Iran, your Bush Derangement Syndrome no longer with status, The President isn't approximately to circulate into into an armed conflict this on the part of his retirement. The boost interior the aria is a smart precaution by using credible danger from Iran. ~OM~ SFCU
2016-10-03 09:32:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
What nuke?
There are no such kind of weapons, that was a media hypnosis enterprize.
Even Hiroshima and Nagasaki were destroyed by 1945 earthquake in Japan.
2015-01-30 17:14:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by Pampampubi 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Are you talking about the America that sends billions of dollars in aid to every sorry third word country in the world? Are you talking about the America that liberated my European country men from the evils of Adolph Hitler? Are you talking about the America that kept the soviets of my and my fellow Europeans behind back in the 60s. 70s and 80s?Are you talking about the America that keeps your sorry country safe because Canada is to "Good" to spend on a military? How would you losers defend yourselves if you were invaded? Please stay out of the USA we already have enough traitors here.
2007-07-01 18:11:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by scarlettt_ohara 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
No, because killing so many nonmilitary people, for something their government is doing without their consent, isn't something i would want to be known for.
What i would do, is what Bush should be doing, focusing on my own country and making all of my citizens' lives better.
2007-07-01 18:35:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by avail_skillz 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
If I were president of Iran I would circumcise my lustful penis and cowar to the power of America and realize that if i were to start a nuclear attack me and my worship "some dude in a well" people will get Hell rained down on our judgemental heads.
2007-07-01 18:19:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
First I will inform the US DOJ of your plans and offering your suggetions to Iranians.
Second, Iran is at leat 6 years away from having a Nuke, so there is no need to worry, once they get close to 6months Israel will target them and we need not to worry about it for another 10,000years.
2007-07-01 18:06:51
·
answer #10
·
answered by Thomas B 5
·
0⤊
2⤋