if you were wrong about your free-will/philosophy? Whatever the answer....Remember its all 42 anyways?
Het philosophers chill out with the 'tudes.
2007-07-01 17:43:13 · 10 answers · asked by Experimental876 4 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
Lisa e-mail me and i'll tell you 42
2007-07-01 17:46:40 · update #1
No. I'm open minded, and smart enough to know what I don't know. I make my judgement on free will from the facts available to me. If it turns out I'm wrong, it just means I didn't have all the facts. But I've always known that, so it wouldn't bother me to have my ignorance confirmed by "enlightenment".
Nor will it excite me to find out that I'm right about having free will. It would have been a lucky guess for the same reasons stated above. OK, maybe I'd have a little bit of pride, but in my enlightened state, I'd know I was simply endulging in a false pride.
2007-07-01 18:50:22 · answer #1 · answered by freebird 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
because of the fact it relatively is a sloppy use of the observe. The observe "appropriate" is somewhat meaningless exterior of somewhat strict definitions. you could talk a pair of appropriate circle or appropriate isohedron, because of the fact they're strictly defined. they might additionally be stated as an precis concept although no appropriate circles are huge-unfold relatively. even if, how do you define a appropriate guy or woman? Which version of human is the kind for perfection? God is much greater vaguely defined. to declare that God is suited is even much less significant. BTW, faith isn't approximately attempting to prevail in perfection. If that have been real, religious human beings might spend greater time engaged on themselves than others. in actuality, faith keeps itself dealing with gaining and protecting converts. It does that by emotional manipulation, which comprise early life indoctrination. it relatively is greater approximately merchandising in-group questioning than achieving "perfection".
2016-10-03 09:29:17 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
To answer these questions ,I believe that its a must to understand the question as a whole.I cant answer to the fullest cause i have no clue whats "42" about...want to enlighten me on the number? It would be appreciated.
2007-07-05 14:23:38 · answer #3 · answered by : ) 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
42 or NOT! I'm not Wrong!
2007-07-01 17:52:09 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No at at all, after all this would be a personal experience,not neccessairily applicable to anyone else
2007-07-01 22:43:45 · answer #5 · answered by chrisvoulg1 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
about 6 mnths ago or so i was on the brink of it, i just couldn't gather enough energy to do it.
2007-07-01 17:48:11 · answer #6 · answered by StealthShadow 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Six times nine, baby. Six times nine.
2007-07-01 17:51:02 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No,I would gladly embrace it.
2007-07-03 03:11:22 · answer #8 · answered by Candi Apples 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Please explain "42", I never understood that.
2007-07-01 17:46:01 · answer #9 · answered by Lisa 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
..No.
2007-07-01 17:49:22 · answer #10 · answered by shmux 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋