English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The country I fear the most is mexico.They are a third world nation who's corrupt ways aren't still good enough to join that kind of union as of yet.

2007-07-01 17:20:05 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government International Organizations

5 answers

It is to break down the middle class.

The middle class has enough punch to controll politics, so eliminating them gives them absolute control.

Look at other countries!

Whith no middle class, we are doomed!

And allowing our wages to fall from Imigration is the easy way to get rid of the middle class!

They are selling our jobs and moving low pay labor in!

What does this sound like to you?????

Wake Up America!

2007-07-01 18:30:02 · answer #1 · answered by jim c 4 · 0 0

For the earnings of people who do no longer stick to your link, the substance of the information tale is Obama's appointment of Ron Kirk as commerce chief. The appointment of Ron Kirk is SURREAL while taken inclusive of Obama's marketing campaign grants approximately NAFTA and customarily approximately convalescing the lives of standard human beings. If that appointment isn't adequate to convince those that Obama is a CON, no longer something would be. They (Obama and his handlers and insiders) have become so smug they are not even pretending to be on the side of the hassle-free human beings to any extent further - as further and further appointments are made that needless to say practice the status quo will proceed ON ALL FRONTS. to respond to your question .... the Obama administration will stick to a similar direction because of the fact the Bush administration because of the fact they answer to a similar masters - the banksters and the corporate elite. to shop u.s., human beings might desire to awaken in time for 2012 to vote in shape-friendly politicians. it would desire to already be too previous due. Can midsection type u.s. stay to tell the tale yet another 4 years of the status quo? possibly yet its questionable. Can midsection type u.s. stay to tell the tale yet another 8 YEARS of the status quo. honestly no longer.

2016-10-03 09:28:16 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

MAYBE THEY WANT IT TO BE LIKE EUROPEAN UNION WHEREIN THEY HAVE OPEN BORDERS FOR EVERYONE WHO IS RESIDENT OF NORTH AMERICA, IN THIS REGARD THEN MEXICAN WORKERS CAN GO TO USA AND CANADA WORK THERE FOR THE SAME PAY THEY ARE GETTING AND LEGITIMIZING THEIR ILLEGAL STAY IN THIS COUNTRIES THIS WAY THE IMMIGRATION PROBLEMS OF ALMOST 12 MILLIONS ILLEGALS WILL BE SOLVED AND WE STILL CAN HAVE THE CHEAP CHICANO LABORER. DON'T YOU THINK THAT WILL BE A GOOD BENEFIT FOR BOTH USA AND CANADA AND WE DON'T HAVE TO BUILD FENCES AND GET RID OF ALL THOSE BORDER PATROLS AND IMMIGRATION PEOPLE IN THE SOUTH ALSO GET RID OF ILLEGAL HUMAN TRAFFICKING BECAUSE EVERYBODY JUST HAE TO WALK ACROSS THE BORDER AND COME BACK HOME WHEN WORK IS FINISHED. THE ONLY BORDER WE HAVE TO WATCH WILL BE AIR AND OCEAN WILL BE EASIER AND CHEAPER. WE CAN EVEN AFFORD TO WATCH THE BORDER OF BOTH COUNTRIES MEXICO AND CANADA AND STILL IT WILL BE CHEAPER.

2007-07-01 21:13:04 · answer #3 · answered by livinhapi 6 · 0 1

With Canada maybe, but don't trust Mexico.

2007-07-01 17:26:17 · answer #4 · answered by niddlie diddle 6 · 2 0

to have more territory and more money

2007-07-01 17:27:10 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers