inside job.... NO DOUBT ABOUT IT!!.. anyone can see this unless they are in grade two..
2007-07-01 17:09:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
I think people who do NOT beleive it was a conspiracy needs to quit name calling and PROVE US WRONG WITH ACTUAL EVIDENCE AS WE HAVE PROVIDED!
Building do not colapse without explosives! The first 3 in history was on 9-11, cant blame a plane on building 7!
Building 7 was reported as "DOWN" 26 minuets before it actualy fell on a live interview with the bbc, the live reporter was doing the news release of the colapse with building 7 standing right behind her in the LIVE SHOT!
How can you report a building falling that is still standing without someone having prior knowledge!???
search google video for bbc building 7 and watch for yourself!
http://www.judicialwatch.org/archive/2007/Saudi%20Docs%202.pdf here is the pdf doc where the FBI let OBL leave the U.S. By air, when all americans were grounded.
here is the news release of it! http://pressesc.com/01182364324_osama_charter
Where are the engines from the plane from the pentagon????. Only 12 tons worth of titanium! And it is not possible that it melted from jet fuel! Not possible! Jet fuel does not burn that hot! And it was the only fuel there!
Firemen said they kept hearing "explosions" as they were working the WTC.
Film of firemen and police reporting that building 7 was coming down prior to its perfect colapse!
and a plane hits a gov building(pentagon) in the most guarded airspace in the world an HOUR after they knew there were "highjackers" in the planes>>??????
What fools you are to buy that one!
Hey, I have a penny here worth a MILLION BUCKS! any takers???
Just as smart!
Look at facts instead of assuming!
The ones that deny that 9-11 was an inside job are the real theorist!
Walk the walk, or shut up the name calling!
2007-07-02 03:04:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by jim c 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Inside job? Hardly. Inside involevement? Possibly.
2007-07-05 11:53:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by Nurse Annie 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Opinion? There is NO credible evidence whatsoever that it was an inside job. That's a fact. Conspiracy nuts could do us all a favor and find something more legitimate to make stuff up about. Read the 9/11 report. Look at the real evidence. And read the article posted below. There is no opinion on this issue. There is the right answer, and the wrong one.
2007-07-01 16:56:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by Mr. Taco 7
·
3⤊
4⤋
In order to believe 9-11 was an inside job, you would have to believe that a US president only in office for 8 months would knowingly order the deathsof 3000 Innocent people and that the Military would carry out the order. I spent 20 years in the armed forces (and despite the propaganda of the left showing members of the armed forces as a bunch of killers) and I met no one that would have taken part in such an attack.
2007-07-01 16:55:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by smsmith500 7
·
3⤊
3⤋
Oh, so now you want to blame the media for 9/11? Gimme a break.
2007-07-01 17:03:49
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
Really, I doubt if it was an inside job. However, I truly believe that it would not have happened if the Clinton Administration had been on their toes. They let so many of the terrorists slip through their fingers repeatedly.
I am not certain that President Bush is doing much better, but at least he put the world on notice.
For sure, immigration and other laws were not being enforced.
2007-07-01 16:52:53
·
answer #7
·
answered by Nothingusefullearnedinschool 7
·
3⤊
3⤋
it was an inside job and i found some videos on youtube.com that shows many weird events during 9/11 and the practices that the u.s. government was doing before the attacks
2007-07-01 16:56:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by acdcpinkfloydmetallica 2
·
1⤊
3⤋
People who think 9/11 was a conspiracy need to grow some balls.
2007-07-01 17:05:38
·
answer #9
·
answered by VladTheImpaler 2
·
3⤊
2⤋
There's no possible way that it was an inside job.
If anything, our government knew more about the attack beforehand than they'll let us know and did not act on it like they should have.
2007-07-01 16:55:15
·
answer #10
·
answered by StateofMind 2
·
0⤊
4⤋