NO!
Bush and his father WERE meeting with members of the Bin Laden family in the days before 9/11!!!
Ever stopped to wonder why?
NORAD has a solid history of intercepting planes immediately that lose ground contact and go off course!!! Anyone question why they didn't during 9/11?
Why have none of the facts that Moore brought to light ever been answered by the Bush administration?
2007-07-01 16:29:42 · 32 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I think many of you have overlooked the fact that he also was a Roman Catholic Eagle Scout CONSERVATIVE that WANTED to believe our government was just!
But couldn't be silent in the FACT that they are NOT!
I think he would have done his movie regardless of whether the ruling parties were Democrat or Republican!
2007-07-01 16:45:29 · update #1
Yea. Sure, you can always find one sand-grain of Truth amongst a beach full of Propaganda, but to what purpose?
Any incidental "facts" found within Moore's work serve only to provide a smokescreen for the motherload of disinformation.
2007-07-01 16:44:00 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 9⤊ 2⤋
Why should our President acknowledge nucklhead Moore? Bush is better than that. He's not going to do the same thing Edwards has done with Coulter.
As for the Norad idea; do you really think the government should have shot down one of our own passenger jetliners over NYC because they were off course?!
You do realize that this was the first time in history that a passenger jetliner was used as a weapon, don't you? As this thing was happening, nobody was sure if it was intentional or accidental.
2007-07-01 18:38:00 · answer #2 · answered by Granny Gruntz 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why in the world would the President of the United states "answer" to a fat loser like Micheal Moore?
Is this a prank question? because it is the silliest i have ever read on Q&A. The Bush family is in oil - did you know that?
They invest money all over the world - did you read that too.
Were you expecting NORAD to shoot down an American commerical jetliner with no problem other than they had lost radio contact & they were off course? I can imagine the stupid comments if they had shot it down. The airliner could have had mechanical problems.
The "supposed facts" have been answered to geath by every sane personin the world including most of the media. NO, sorry, they did not say what you wanted to hear.
Move own - the Presidents of the United States did not conspire to kill 3,000 people. Micheal Moore did make the oney he wanted & got respect from a few gullible people, but not me.
2007-07-01 16:45:37 · answer #3 · answered by Wolfpacker 6 · 9⤊ 1⤋
OK, There are guys who come into work and say what the coach of some pro football team should do or should have done. It's kind of a joke because if they knew better than they would be the coach. Obvioiusly they don't have all the information. If the coach gave out info publicly then the other team would know key info.
Why do so many people think they have more information than our president and military. Again - there's alot we don't know and they can't tell for national security reasons. You "armchair presidents" make me sick to my stomach.
It's funny when football fans do it. It's no joke when bitter people breed a culture of hate on it.
BTW, Did you want a question answered ? I don't see where you have any question that you'll accept an answer to.
2007-07-01 16:53:49 · answer #4 · answered by Jimbob 4 · 7⤊ 1⤋
Did you ever stop and wonder why Michael Moore puts out films like F 9/11?
He has obviously made a lot of fame and fortune by being a Quixotic figure, running around at windmills. He has found a niche of people that want to believe in conspiracies, and exploits that market by putting together little oddities like "Gee, the Bushes met the Bin Ladens (who happen to be one of the most powerful families in a nation where we get the majority of our oil...who would have thought they would ever meet to discuss business?) prior to 9/11?"
Moore is an Oliver Stone wannabe. Prey on the emotions of people, make a low cost flick, and cash in at the box office.
2007-07-01 16:43:15 · answer #5 · answered by Pythagoras 7 · 10⤊ 3⤋
Bush has class enough not to waste his time on obvious rubbish like that in Moore's films. His attempts at being antagonistic are purposely lost on our President and I, for one, am glad to see it.
2007-07-01 17:26:54 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Moore recently refused to appear on "The Factor". I believe he doesn't want to have to defend his views or beliefs, he will only go on shows that allow him to enhance his views depicted in his movies UNCHALLENGED. Why won't Micheal Moore face the people he accuses? Ever stopped to wonder why?
2007-07-01 17:11:38 · answer #7 · answered by toptuner1 2 · 5⤊ 0⤋
I saw a lot of people, who were in the movie, were furious because there quotes were cut to fit Moore's agenda.
2007-07-01 21:16:25 · answer #8 · answered by bigdaddy33 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Oh Miss Kelly. I do not aways agree with your Q&A'a but I never thought you'd go over to the conspiracy theroy side. The stuff that Moore said has been answered over and over.
2007-07-01 17:25:52 · answer #9 · answered by ohbrother 7 · 6⤊ 0⤋
You need to check your facts on pages that do not represent the conspiracies. By that i mean do not rely on prisonplanet.com, or Ihatebush.com. the facts are not what you have posted, Norad has only limited fighters at any one time their record is actually rather slow.
And the bin laden family has many members, few of which have anything to do with UBL. So check your facts for real and have a nice life.
2007-07-01 16:37:25 · answer #10 · answered by SFC_Ollie 7 · 12⤊ 3⤋