2007-07-01 14:13:20 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I don't think he intentionally murdered her, but he still should have been charged with manslaughter or something. He got off scot-free because of his money and who he was. If he had been some ordinary Joe he wouldn't have been so lucky.
2007-07-01 14:20:32 · answer #1 · answered by Dinah Steeler 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. I think he murdered the girl because he was running for Congress and about to do the nasty with a young volunteer. Not only would have that come out, but it would have surfaced, no pun intended, that he crashed the car into the water because he was driving while intoxicated. He such a selfish, arrogant jerk!
2007-07-01 21:25:17 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Only he knows what happened for sure and he's not talking. He probably had impaired driving and judgment. I think he is the liberal son of a man who made a deal with the devil and lost.
2007-07-01 21:23:26 · answer #3 · answered by magpie 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
you're a moron and about forty years out of date. Senator Kennedy is a good representative. (I don't like the Immigration Bill). But I've voted for him several times.
If he runs again, he's got my vote !
2007-07-01 21:18:10 · answer #4 · answered by rick m 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No. I think he was drunk and ran the car off the road. He did not have sense about himself to get help. He had to sleep it off. He should have been charged with vehicular manslaughter.
2007-07-01 21:18:15 · answer #5 · answered by Eyota Zen 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Ted, little Jesus" Kennedy? He did'nt have sex with her cause he used a rubber! Ask "slick wilie", he'll tell ya that ain't sex! Vote for representative Ron Paul & support OUR Libertarian party to take back YOUR country/freedoms!!!
2007-07-01 21:20:14 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
who knows what goes through the inebriated mind of the swimmer extraordinaire?
or the idiots that keep voting for him?
2007-07-01 21:18:45 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I guess his brain just shut down and he panicked. Just like he does in the senate.
2007-07-01 21:17:42 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Nope, he was drunk and made a mistake. Someone with his funds could keep it somewhat quite without violence.
2007-07-01 21:17:44 · answer #9 · answered by oldcorps1947 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
No. He was just a drunk worried about his reputation.
2007-07-01 21:21:24 · answer #10 · answered by vegaswoman 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋