Are you joking?
That would leave Hillary with no platform, and nothing to say.
Ever since Democrats got the black vote, they have been playing the race card. Pandering to minorities? Why do you think Democrats like Sen. Kennedy are so anxious to get 20 million (mainly) Mexicans here? Statistics show that recent immigrants predominantly vote for the party that panders to their selfish demands for freebies.
What is so funny about the class warfare is that, we live in an age that most of our grandparents couldn't even dream of. Most people own their own homes, have two cars, cable tv, mobile phones, take nice vacations, eat in restaurants, and buy so many clothes that they don't even have enough closet space. We take all this for granted, but when things get a bit tight, the Democrats start playing the class warfare game, trying to intimate that the rich are bilking the middle class and the poor out of "their rightful" money.
The only way I want Hillary cleaning up the White House is if they hire her as a maid.
2007-07-01 12:54:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by pachl@sbcglobal.net 7
·
5⤊
1⤋
Not as long as she's doing a better job of it than Barrack Obama.
Hillary has strong ties to the Black community as a legacy of her husband's Presidency. Bill, you may recall, was affectionately known as the "First Black President." So, that's a constituency that she needs to keep sweet. It's certainly less hypocritical than GOP closet queens pandering to the Fundies on Gay Rights/
Calling corporations on special interest legislation, gouging and making jobs America's number one export is all part of being the candidate for the People's Party. And why is it only "Class Warfare" when the Middle Class fights back?
By "pandering to minorities," I presume you mean Fred Thompson's blunder in calling Cuban exiles a terrorist threat. The Cuban Exile community in Florida has been a strong Right Wing voting bloc and a major source of campaign contributions since the early sixties. They also own a huge chunk of the Spanish Language Media. Any "terrorist" activities on their part have been on behalf of the Republican Party. (Four of the Five Watergate burglars were Cuban Exiles.)
Hillary would have been stupid to not take a crack at stealing this important Republican constituency in a must win State for the GOP.
As far as the "woman cleaning up" crack. There are things men can say that are considered unladylike--so it evens out.
2007-07-01 12:47:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Hillary dosn't stand a chance...
1. Supported Illegal Immigration Bill.
2. 2nd leading recipient of money from Health Care Industry Lobbyists in Congress and Senate.
3. Compare her votes to her speeches. She seems to be incapable of telling the truth.
4. Made millions off Haliburton, Exxon stock. You know the "Evil Oil Company Types".
5. Does she have a platform other than hate?
2007-07-01 12:36:03
·
answer #3
·
answered by Ken C 6
·
6⤊
0⤋
No. She's perfect. How naive of Obama to think of that unlawful immigrants have not have been given any effect on taking jobs away. She in no way pronounced blacks might desire to be outraged - she pronounced that illegals are stealing jobs. What you're writing is deceptive and slanderous. it relatively is trouble-free sense and any candidate up there might have pronounced a similar ingredient with a million/2 a strategies. provide me a thumbs down - provided which you actual think of that no black guy or woman everywhere is dropping a job to an unlawful who will paintings for much less.
2016-10-03 09:05:16
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Oh, come on..... she come too faaaahhhhr to turn back now. Can you imagine if a white male conservative had mocked blacks with that feigned accent? Trent Lott paid a compliment to a half dead man and was removed from his leadership position after the incessant hand-wringing from the libs and their cohorts in the press. All she's ever done to promote herself is ride the coattails of a nearly impeached president who screws around on her all the time, and use her position as a woman to pander every alleged victim of American society that ever existed. I can't believe anyone would take her seriously.
2007-07-01 13:01:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
You are positively correct. She wants to win by dividing the Country further. She does O.K. with her millions but the rest of the U.S. should be Socialist bordering on Communism.
I am convinced that Hillary or Obama will destroy the U.S. They will do or say anything to win. It will be a tragedy but people will continue to vote for them in spite of the lies, deceit and their records.
They instigate class warfare but do nothing personally to help others and they intend to remain in the millionaire elites on our taxes.
We now work until July 1 to pay for government spending and they don't think we are taxed enough. They won't change the tax code because they can rely on the loopholes afforded them.
It is all lies and rhetoric!
2007-07-01 15:28:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋
Even more. could you imagine a WHITE male saying this. He would be crucified by the media and every other mouth piece. The media of america is racist in the sense of being biased towards minority groups because they're afraid ob being perceived of being racist. Some folks would call this reverse racism but there is no such thing, you are either racist or not. Whenever anyone makes a decision to faver a race because of their gender or race even if it's the opposite race that is prejudice.
2007-07-01 12:33:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
2⤋
Hillary is more expierenced than incest mob tied Guiliani, but I would vote for Romney, or Ron Paul
2007-07-04 17:28:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No i can't imagine a male candidate saying that but you never know theese days. I doubt Hillary even said those exact words, you probobly took it the wrong way. But idk. & race is like American, African, not Woman haha. Even though I used to hate hillary I honestly don't mind if she's elected. She won't do any worse than Bush has done. I used to think I was a republican but there are many democratic views that make sense. But hey, maybe we should send a woman in to do what a man obviously can't do (bush)
2007-07-01 12:34:32
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋
She is a nutcase but liberals buy into the drivel. She has made anti semetic statements that were caught on tape but dems get a pass on that. She is a horrible person and that goes beyond her being a democrat- she is just dishonest and a political hack. Bush pisses me off 65% of the time but at least he does what he actually believes rather than what he thinks will get him elected or adored.
2007-07-01 12:31:27
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
11⤊
1⤋