English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

having a set of thousands of objects falling into the hole in a line. At a moment in time the object that is nearest the black hole inside the event horizon takes photos of what it looks like within the black hole. This digital information is immediately transmitted to the next object just outside where it is then transmitted out to the next object behind it.
At a point in time the transmission is across the line of the event horizon, and let us say that the two objects are only one meter apart. Although it would not be possible for light and radio waves to get the whole way out, gravity is not strong enough to prevent the radio waves from crossing that short distance.
Then once the information is outside the event horizon, and it can be transmitted out in the normal way.

Would this be a way (obviously in theory only) to view the insides of a black hole?

Just curious.

2007-07-01 10:55:20 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Astronomy & Space

6 answers

No. Your probe just inside the Schwarzshild radius would not be able to communicate with a probe just outside, by any means whatsoever. This is why the Schwarzshild radius is called an "event horizon". Furthermore, there is no way to perturb the shape of the event horizon to allow any information to pass through it.

2007-07-01 11:13:30 · answer #1 · answered by cosmo 7 · 0 0

The camera just inside the event horizon can't send a signal to the camera just outside the event horizon. That's what an event horizon is.

Gravity certainly IS strong enough to prevent radio waves from crossing a distance of one meter, or one centimeter, or one millimeter, when there's an event horizon halfway across that meter. That's what an event horizon is.

2007-07-01 11:04:37 · answer #2 · answered by ZikZak 6 · 0 0

This gets into some exceedingly severe stuff that would desire to take some years of analyze to totally comprehend (which i've got not got), yet i will clarify the gist of it. Hawking proposed a fashion that black holes evaporate over the years. First, you're able to desire to comprehend slightly background approximately those issues talked approximately as digital debris. Quantum physics predicts that tiny debris pop into area and disappear in simple terms approximately rapidly. those debris look in pairs. An antiparticle seems with each particle and that they annihilate one yet another somewhat promptly. Now, what happens if those 2 debris are created on the form horizon of the black hollow. think of that the antiparticle gets sucked into the black hollow and the different particle keeps to be exterior of the black hollow. This as quickly as digital particle is now a genuine particle. because of the fact rely/capability won't be able to be created or destroyed, the black hollow might desire to have lost some capability! that's the way you will possibly desire to earnings decrease back all the preparation lost interior the black hollow. for super black holes this take billions upon billions of years, yet for tiny microscopic black holes (that are envisioned), they evaporate in simple terms approximately rapidly and no person sees their outcomes. in actuality, there is in all probability a black hollow relatively on the part of you perfect now. do no longer challenge although, because of the fact it substitute into long gone as quickly because it appeared.

2016-10-03 08:59:04 · answer #3 · answered by koffler 4 · 0 0

No because radio waves are just another form of light and travel at 186,000 miles per sec. They would be trapped inside the event horizon also and fall towards the singularity.

2007-07-01 11:04:29 · answer #4 · answered by ? 6 · 0 0

In the event of finding a black hole you would need to size it up and witness something go through its phases. Its with these phases that man can judge whether or not to send a probe into investigate such a matter. We meaning man, haven't experienced anti-matter as a matter of fact.

2007-07-01 11:10:01 · answer #5 · answered by upyerjumper 5 · 0 1

'gravity is not strong enough to prevent...'
Sorry, but yes it is. Distance is not important. If escape velocity is greater than the speed of light then it doesn't matter how far you are going. Light can't then move a millionth of an inch, let alone a metre.

2007-07-01 11:03:02 · answer #6 · answered by florayg 5 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers