No,she went to get an appointment to the new Islamic World State Government.
She'll be a charge of one of the new slave camps.
If you can't whip them join them,she don't think we can win.
2007-07-01 09:26:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋
Who? I never heard of Nancy Polanski. I have heard of Nancy Pelosi going to Syria before. Before you bash us wrongfully for going after Bush and his Regime for his crimes, you better get a person's name right or people will know that you don't really know what you're talking about. Plus, the only attacks Nancy PELOSI does are to criticize the Bush administration, though she still claims impeachment to be "Off The Table".
2007-07-01 18:11:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
LOL Where to start....
Who is "Nancy Polanski"? Are you referring to Speaker of the House and Majority Whip, Nancy PELOSI?
And if we were going to "set up" attacks in any country, that would go through the CIA, which Nancy PELOSI has nothing to do with. And I have enough faith in the CIA to believe if they wanted to blow something in up in England (or anywhere else), it wouldn't be something so stable the English Police actually impounded one of the vehicles before realizing at the Impound Yard, they had to call the Bomb Squad.
And the word, as you are using it, is "SINCE", "Liberal's" should not have an apostrophe, "comeing" is spelled "coming", and I THINK you mean "crap", as I know very few Liberals who come up with fish. And the word, as you use it here, is spelled "SENSE".
D plus.
2007-07-01 16:33:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
Why would you ask such an asinine question? Instead of hating someone just because they are in the other party why don't you try looking for a way of working with them? Her name is not Polanski. Is that supposed to be more name calling that makes you feel better. Well I have news for you it makes you look rather silly.
2007-07-01 17:01:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Nothing known would indicate Pelosi doing that.
The question of "false flag" terrorists acts is legitimate.
The most recent events with cars packed with gasoline and propane in the UK were unusual.
"False flag" acts of terrorism should be considered in all terrorists act investigations as a real possibility to be ruled out.
This should be considered from the facts of the event, rather than picking an individual because you do not agree with them, as your question suggests, and trying to tie them to the act.
Did someone other than Jihadists conduct the act, blaming it on Muslim terrorists?
Who might be motivated to do that?
2007-07-01 16:54:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by mirror 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Who the hell is Nancy Polanski?
Besides that glaring error, I count no less than six other misspellings, grammatical errors or incorrect punctuations. It certainly doesn't bide well for your "side" - whoever your "side" might be - when your use of the English language is so atrocious. Stupid is as stupid does. -RKO- 07/01/07
2007-07-01 16:46:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by -RKO- 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
apparently your half-arsed attempt at a question makes sense to you too, cuz your grammar and your world leaders are confused
Nancy Pelosi is the speaker who went to Syria
It's since, not sence.
It's liberals, not Liberal's.
It's coming, not comeing.
It's crap, not carp.
It's everything, not everting, and you need a comma after that.
It's sense, not sence.
2007-07-01 16:28:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by The Frontrunner 5
·
5⤊
0⤋
You aren't referring to Nancy pelosi, the speaker of the house, that showed Condi how to do her job are you?
2007-07-01 16:38:32
·
answer #8
·
answered by qncyguy21 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Who is Nancy Polanski?
2007-07-01 16:23:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by ck4829 7
·
4⤊
2⤋
Yeah, that's it. You are an A-1 intelligence analyst now. Did you already tell the FBI your startling epiphany?
2007-07-01 16:23:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by Chance20_m 5
·
3⤊
2⤋