180,000 or 800,000 deaths.... which is the worst?

Question

Bush's war OF Terror has been directly responsible for the deaths of 800,000 people both in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Yet, Cons still try to claim that 180,000 estimated deaths in Iraq during Saddam's reign was justifiable reason to hang him.... what then should happen to Bush?

Plus.. who gave Saddam the WMD to gas 180,000 people? I am not sure.

Answer 1

The chemical weapons where traded for ____fill in blank___, in the form of farm chemicals. the trade kept up even while the Iranians complained that Iraq was using them as chemical weapons delivered by the planes that were provided by the same country that supplied Saddam with his Anthrax culture from their culture collection, that was authorized by their State Department.....wasn't European countries.

Answer 2

Previous administrations supported Saddam to prevent Iran from becoming a dominant power in the middle east and a general destabilization. Now we hand it over on a silver platter.

Answer 3

First off the 800,000 number is a complete farce,just as the 650,000 number was before that. I would say it's not even close,unless of course you actually believe the US has killed over 400 innocent civilians,per day,since the war began. It's ludicrous at best.Not to mention that the vast majority of civilian deaths have been at the hands of other civilians, otherwise known as terrorists,but according to the left they are called freedom fighters and regarded as heroes. So the question is really how do we get Cindy Sheehans heroes to quit killing innocent civilians?

AD

Answer 4

Ofcource 800,000 deaths.but you see as the person responsible for these death is in "power" so these deaths are justified and 180,000 are not ! All what counts is "power" !

Answer 5

That is an awful lot of deaths and is very tragic. However, do you realize that every day in America alone, we MURDER nearly 4,000 of our own helpless babies. And all we call these senseless acts is "the right to choose". Why don't we give the little ones a voice??? Don't they ever have the "right to choose"??? What have they done to deserve the treatment they receive?
Over 50,000,000 of our own children have been slaughtered since Roe vs. Wade and we continually look away. When will we hear the cries of our babies instead of drowning them out. War is terrible but abortion is nothing other than cold-blooded murder of INNOCENT lives!!

Answer 6

I suppose you counted them yourself right?

Oh yea...you lost count here and there and threw in a few for good measure, but you said it was true and so that is fact....you really are a liberal.....

When you show some facts instead of your "word" you'll get a little more attention.

I don't think you want me flashing Clinton's death toll for you during his time of "peace"....you really wouldn't like the number and then you would call the FACTS false...just like a good liberal.

Answer 7

i suppose we should have surrendered on 9/12 in order to bring peace to the middle east.

it was the iraqis who hung saddam according to the video that i saw.

yes, we all know the liberal line, there were no WMDs, and we gave them to him.

Answer 8

I guarantee each Con that answers uses one of these reasons:

1) Libs burn flags
2) Libs hate America
3) It's the Libs fault
4) The Libs started the war
5) Clinton killed more people
6) We are over there to help establish democracy

Be daring Cons, come up with a new argument!

Answer 9

european countries supplied saddam with chemical weapons. We likely played a role as well.

Answer 10

of the 800,00 you claim i bet 95% or more would still happen if we werent there(they kill each other we try to stop it) if not true why does areas like darfur want us back. ps wmds make take years to find saddam had super secrecy workesr were killed after hideing places built.