what is the purpose of living? to acquire wealth by exploiting others or sacrificing our lives for others?

Question

"if we have chosen work in which we can accomplish the most for mankind, then no burdens can bow us, because they are only sacrifices for every one.then we enjoy no poor, limited egoistic joy,for our happiness belongs to millions, our deeds live on eternally, and our ashes are watered by the tears of noble human beings"---KARL MARX(1835)

Answer 1

Um, none of the above. You shouldn't exploit others or sacrifice yourself. There is something called a "happy medium"...

Answer 2

If you think with a scientific logic about the question, 'what is the purpose of living?' you will probably find that there is very little point to us living at all.
I believe that humans and the planet earth on which we live originated by one cataclysmic accident.
What are the chances of the earth being just the right distance from the sun for any life to form to exist?
That being said can we really say that there is a purpose to us living? If we think about it away from the abstract thoughts that we are here on earth for a reason, when really, concretely, we aren't meant to be here, we can't possibly believe that as humans we have a purpose.
It is down to each individual as to whether they feel they have an obligation to help others or indeed themselves but really if we are all an accident then do we have any real moral obligation at all?

Answer 3

the actuality that we stay and respiratory and able to do a majority of those issues. the actuality that we are actually not rocks and a few divine accident made use who we are somewhat of a few inorganic atom. the actuality we can furnish issues properly worth. we can categorise. Its all alluring, the sight, the sound, the feel, the emotion, the flavor. Even discomfort. we can sense that no longer many different issues can. discomfort may well be painful, yet we can sense it in simple terms as we can sense happy. Its astonishing relatively that out of all of this we can do those issues. besides the actuality that it sort of feels to suck on occasion its nonetheless impressive. random actuality: in case you shoot a rabbit, it doesnt comprehend why it feels discomfort, it does not sign in that there is a proof, it in simple terms is familiar with it feels discomfort and as a reaction will run away, whether its demise. Shoot a human (whether they did no longer comprehend what a gun substitute into) it would know its some thing released, have some variety or information of what to do etc. I dont think of this variation into proper yet its written now... yet while youre finding for one reason it would relatively be pie.

Answer 4

The answerer Rozbeanz is a scary individual if he truly lives what he has pointed out. The end of his statement sounded like that of a serial killer. Scientifically I understand his point, but the fact that we ARE is the reason we have a purpose to live and a MORAL obligation. The purpose should be to make the best possible effort to never adversely affect our surroundings whether animal, vegetable, or mineral. To in fact benefit all that we can whenever possible.

Answer 5

My own purpose of living, my dear friend, is:

To fly high together with you my dear friend
over all bright hilltops and glowing mountains
and above all deep flowery dales and blue seas

with you to ever ever bravely overfly
all the known horizons and borders
and those imagined and those unimaginable

with you with warm impulse and good sense
fiercely on the hard life struggle for survival
fiercely against all subduing and surrendering

on the proud pilgrim's path to perfection
on the blazing flowerful springtime path
of ever ever dazzling virtuosity and virtuality

of ever daring exciting adventure in the Sun
ever ever proudly rising and ever converging
on the glowing scented path to bright infinity.

With you to fly high and far, my dear friend,
past all the nearby green hills of the soul
past all flowery dales and glowing mountains

daringly ever, glowingly ever, into yonder Infinity.

Answer 6

I don't believe that either of those explains our purpose for living....

I do believe that our purpose for living is to make the most of what we have, to do what we can to help others, to make this world a better place (environmentally speaking), to put an end to hatred and violence, to learn all we can to pass on to the next generations, and to get into a field or cause that truly touches us.

Too much emphasis is put on the almighty dollar and material things. Too many people have died--needlessly.

Answer 7

Karl Marx was a communist but Mother Theresa would have agreed with his sentiments. I'm sure she found more joy and respect in her life than many very wealthy people.
And Jesus would also have agreed. He said that a rich person who clings to his wealth will not make it to heaven. (I've often suspected that Jesus was the first true communist - perhaps the only true one).
Each person must choose their own path and the consequences that go with it.

Answer 8

I would say neither. I believe our purpose in living is to serve all people as much as possible, but this brings happiness and not sacrifice. If you think of it as a sacrifice, then you need to work on your wisdom and compassion more. Sacrifice is abuse of ones self. Doings acts for others in not necessarily an abuse on one self if the acts are done is in loving compassion for oneself and others.

I believe it was Mahatma Ghandi why he sacrificed so much for other people and he answered he did not sacrife for other people, he did actions because they brought him happiness.

Buddha and Mahatma Ghandi-I try to never rely on the western philosophers.

Answer 9

"The moral purpose of a man's life is the achievement of his own happiness. This does not mean that he is indifferent to all men, that human life is of no value to him and that he has no reason to help others in an emergency. But it does mean that he does not subordinate his life to the welfare of others, that he does not sacrifice himself to their needs, that the relief of their suffering is not his primary concern, that any help he gives is an exception, not a rule, an act of generosity, not of moral duty, that it is marginal and incidental - as disasters are marginal and incidental in the course of human existence - and that values, not disasters, are the goal, the first concern and the motive power of his life."

Answer 10

that depends on what kind of government your country has. if it's capitalistic then acquiring wealth through exploitation is a noble pursuit.after all you can always give back to the people in the form of philantrophic deeds. if it's a marxist state then sacrificing everything for the good of the state is everything.

Answer 11

Every person must answer this question for himself. Every person must define the measure by which he will assess himself. It is the height of presumption to assume that every person must live up to the same standard. If we are to do that, we alienate the person from his very life. As there is room on this dusty plant for every human being, there is room for every noble aspiration. Nobility would mean the absence of harm to others. We have to assume that the advancement of every individual, even in egocentric acts, is inevitably an advancement of all, for all of us are made up of each of us as individuals. Therefore, harm to one, is harm to all.