English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The illustrator has said that she does everything on purpose, and that everything is supported by the book. Look closely at Harry's forehead. Do you see anything strange about it? I believe that this clearly supports 2 theories--Harry is a Horcrux and Harry will not be killed by the removal of the Horcrux.

2007-07-01 05:59:27 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities Books & Authors

Voldemort did not intend to make Harry a Horcrux. How was the house destroyed? There was all sorts of magic flying around that Halloween, and Voldemort's wand was pointing at Harry. The Horcrux spell was accidentaly shot at Harry. As for the fact that Voldemort was trying to kill Harry, did anyone notice that after Voldemort possessed Harry and found out about his mistake that he stopped trying to kill Harry. All the Death Eaters say to leave him alone, including Snape (even though Snape is good, he still gets inside info from Voldemort), that he is for Voldemort and Voldemort alone. Why? Because only Voldemort knows how to remove the Horcrux safely and then kill Harry.

2007-07-01 08:27:08 · update #1

Oh and as for the fact that Dumbledore is telling the full truth. I believe he is too, but he also says that there is one that he does not know what it is. Why did Harry's family live in Godric's Hollow? A descendant of Godric Gryffindor might live there. Even though Harry was accidentaly made a Horcrux, Dumbledore is still correct.

2007-07-01 08:28:44 · update #2

2 answers

Oh my goodness, I never noticed that before, I just posted a question about where i think the art cover showed where they were, but I didn't see that his scar doesn't seem to be there, even though his hair is sort of in the way. I think the last word in the book is supposed to be scar, but I have been so firm that he is not a horcrux, because I trust Dumbledore and what he said about his thoughts on them.

2007-07-01 07:37:56 · answer #1 · answered by nanners454 5 · 0 0

Harry is not a horcrux. If he were, Voldemort would want to keep him safe rather than kill him. You only make a horcrux to gain a measure of immortality cause as long as that horcrux continues to exist they can not die. A non-living horcrux must be physically destroyed in some form to destroy the piece of the horcrux maker's soul that resides within it. A living being can die from any number of causes, thus taking the soul piece with them. And that makes using a living thing as a horcrux riskier. Voldemort doesn't want to risk his own immortality by killing Harry if he made him a horcrux.

2007-07-01 15:21:14 · answer #2 · answered by knight1192a 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers