Why is the terrorist who was on fire being treated at a hostpital? surely he should have been left to burn.
If he lives then he will face 90 days of questioning then probably released on bail.... only to get it right next time.
I have said this since the London bombings 2 years ago... if we had kept our borders closed to all and sundry then these incidents wouldnt have happened.
Its only a matter of time and bad luck that the police and the rest of the counter-terrorist force lets one slip through the net and the UK will have a tragedy on the scale of 9/11 if not worse.
Its time we, the UK as a nation stood up to terrorist, including those born on these shores, kick them out and shut the door behind them.
I dont want to live under Islamic rule and im sure no one else does, They will never achieve anything by scaremongering, trying to make us give in... Hittler tried that...
2007-07-01 05:37:38 · 40 answers · asked by vampire_o3 3 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
agree with you 100 percent on that this is our country not theirs they live by our rules not us live theirs and if they dont like it get to H--- out why should i pay national insurance so he can get treatment in our hospitals ?
2007-07-01 05:52:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Read this and pass it on:
Political Correctness is the Incubator of Islamism
by Amil Imani
14 Feb, 2007
Time and again we are told by the politically correct “experts” not to worry about Islam posing a threat to our way of life. We are repeatedly lectured that only a very small minority of Muslims are troublemakers who are giving the peaceful masses of Muslims a bad name. We are also informed that the terrorists, who happened to be Muslims, are the disaffected and the young. And not to worry, since as the fire of youth turns to ashes of old age the rebellious will mellow, as they always have.
With heavy assurances like this, coming from so many know-it-all authoritative figures, we can sleep soundly without the aid of sleeping pills. After all, people reason that these pundits are “experts” whose job is to know and tell it like it is. Those who voice contrary views must be a bunch of racist, alarmist hate mongers. Who is right?
Wouldn’t be more prudent to let the facts settle the matter, rather than blindly accepting either position? Of course it would, except for one huge problem. In the face of threats, people tend to go to the mind’s medicine cabinet and take a few denial and rationalization pills, in the same way that it is the aspirin bottle they turn to when a headache strikes. Why not? We are the Easy Species. We love effortless, quick and simple solutions. And that’s not invariably bad. It has given us all kinds of labor and time saving devices.
Yet, the Islam problem is very real and deadly. Neither the pronouncements of the experts, nor the tranquilizing pills of the mind can make it go away. It is here and it shows every sign of imposing itself on us.
Europe is already badly infected with Islamism. It is the coal-miners’ canary. It is telling us that the next stop is America. We must act and act now. We must not sacrifice our cherished way of life and the lives of our children at the altar of political correctness: the incubator of Islamofascism.
2007-07-01 06:02:33 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Perhaps you should put this question to Mordechai Vanunu, a Jewish technician in Israels atomic plant who passed on information to a British journal regarding Israels atomic capabilities something that Israel has denied ever having !!! He was sentenced to 18 years including 11 years in solitary confinement.Since his release he has been jailed 2 more times for abusing his release conditions which include he shall not be able to have contacts with citizens of other countries but Israel he shall not use phones he shall not own cellullar phones he shall not have access to the Internet he shall not approach or enter embassies and consulates he shall not come within 500 metres of any international border crossing he shall not visit any port of entry and airport he shall not leave the State of Israel If this treatment can happen to a citizen of Israel then God help Arab freedom fighters
2016-04-01 02:07:38 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hard as it may seem, there has to be the Rule of Law.
To behave like the more blood-thirsty participators in Answers is to advocate something as bad as the terrorist.
In this case, the terrorist should have been treated like any other human being, however despicable, but in a prison hospital, so that he could subsequently be interrogated, and stand trial.
2007-07-01 06:16:19 · answer #4 · answered by Canute 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
History will tell you that virtually every non white dominated member of the old British Empire used terrorism in one way or another,the troops tried to quell these terrorists as we tried in Northern Ireland ,but the one thing (in all instances)that we found was that at some point you have to talk to them however distasteful you may find it.
Todays terrorists will be tomorrows negotiators,you may not find that very palatable but just look at the history of the break up of the Empire and you will see.
Direct talks with the countries backing the terrorists will go some way to resolving the national hatreds.
2007-07-01 05:49:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Apart from humanitarian considerations which we must always hols (otherwise we are no better than them) has it not occurred to you that further intelligence may be gained.
Torture is not an answer they will give what you want to hear constant going over the same ground time and time again picking up on inconsistances is the best way. It can be slow sometimes too slow but do we want to beat these people or not
2007-07-01 05:50:51 · answer #6 · answered by Scouse 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Treating your enemy as your self is a right thing to do. Will your actions have a positive impact upon the trained mind reason? probably not. because that mind belonged to a group mind. I have an idea you may be able to say to their group or individual, the choice is yours. They like to blow other people up with themself and I heard another person trying to come up with an idea to try and stop a tornado by placing an explosive inside it well that probably will not work but what to do with a terrorist? take them to a tornado ridden area and let them have their explosives strapped to their body and tell them the tornado is their path to the heavens where all their virgins are waiting for them.
2007-07-01 06:05:42 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not treating a burned human who has not yet been tried and convicted would be UNCIVILISED. The British people will not be tricked into acting against their own Philosophy.
Millions of others do want to live under a Theocracy, and many of those are Jewish and Christian.
Hitler was a Fascist. That is the rulership that Britain fought against in WWII. Do not abandon the freedom won then to those who would manipulate your population with fear.
2007-07-01 06:01:06 · answer #8 · answered by Happy Camper 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
First of all there is such a thing as human rights & regardless of what you think of people all humans have rights.
Secondly as the terrorist has been arrested on the scene he'll probably get a full interrogation.
Whilst I fully agree that we should stand up to terrorists "closing borders to all and sundry" wouldnt do any good as, yet again these are home grown terrorists - ie British citizens & you cant deport them (or in your terminology kick them out) either cos you have to be deported to your own country & as they're British they'd be deported to here.
Those who want to live in Britain under Islamic rule are a tiny minority - the vast majority of Muslims are quite happy with Britain as it is.
2007-07-01 06:10:12 · answer #9 · answered by Lisa 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
I don't think either of these neanderthals will be released on bail - they were caught in the act so the police don't have to waste time on the burden of proof. I imagine they will be detained for questioning for as long as it takes, so their accomplices and contacts can be traced.
I don't think any civilised person could have just let the man burn, however tempting it might be!
2007-07-01 06:39:23 · answer #10 · answered by Beau Brummell 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
firstly how on earth do you question a corpse? you no chance of getting them to talk - unless you've found away.
having someone to question gives you the chance of breaking into his terrorist cell. even if he doesn't talk his other terrorist friends are likly to think he may have done so will go on the run, thus disrupting anything they were going to do.
secondly he went there with the intent on killing as many people as possible and dieing himself in the process, as do all sucide bombers isn't it a big kick in the balls to them a big two fingers up to them, that he will not only know he failed to kill anyone but also failed to kill himself properly - NOW that has to be the worst thing that can happen to a suicide bomber can't it?
Also how can we be better them then if we act as inhumane as they do?
2007-07-01 06:02:05 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋