Yes. William's children would be in line after their father and before Harry. When Harry has children,they will enter the line of succession after their father and before Andrew and his children.
And now to correct a misconception: if William were to die before his child,male or female, were to be of age, a regent would be appointed until the child would come of age;that regent would most likely be Harry.
And if William were to die and leave only female heirs,then the UK would have another Queen,just like when George VI died and his daughter, the current Queen, Elizabeth II,ascended the throne.
2007-07-01 07:12:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋
Yes, so long as William was married to the mother of the child. That child will always be in line before Harry, unless an Act of Parliament removes them.
2007-07-01 05:56:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by WBenson 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes, the same way Hilliam and Harry are in line before Charles' brothers.
2007-07-03 01:55:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by M S 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
YES, assuming Prince William's wife fits the bill. Their child will therefore be in the direct line of succesion.
2007-07-01 05:12:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Depends.
If William gets to the throne then yes, but if William dies before he becomes king then Harrys children would take precedence
2007-07-01 05:12:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by Weatherman 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
Technically yes. The matter of the child's age would come into play if, God forbid, William would die young.
2007-07-01 05:11:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
yes
2007-07-02 01:12:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by Lydia 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
yea its called the first born son...
if Will has say 20 girls and Harry has one child that happens to be a boy then Harry's kid is next in line...
2007-07-01 05:11:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
5⤋
Yes. Harry'd be "free" longer.
2007-07-01 05:10:53
·
answer #9
·
answered by shirleykins 7
·
1⤊
0⤋