And who do you think is going to pass a law saying they can't?
2007-07-01 04:44:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by cwomo 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Houses of Parliament are subject to different rules, but smoking has been banned in most parts of the building for a few years. The difference is that politicians are self-policing so if Gordon Brown lit up a fà g (or a spliff), the Sergeant at Arms would have to report him to - er Gordon Brown.
2007-07-01 04:45:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes, the Palace of Westminster is exempt from the smoking laws but the MP's have elected to observe the ban anyway.
2007-07-01 04:57:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No it's not true , i have letter from the House of Commons stating that the members facilities are not exempt from the legislation , check it out on my 360 !!
2007-07-01 04:57:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by nicemanvery 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
yes they are exempt its something to do with the land deeds or something i dont know the exact terms but they are exempt , how nice eh ? not hypocritical at all !
2007-07-01 04:43:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by bigsexydug 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes it is true. It is considered to be a residence. A Palace.
2007-07-01 04:44:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by blokeoaf 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
They are allowed to smoke there, because it isn't a public place.
2007-07-01 04:46:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by metallicash 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't mind if they smoke. They can catch fire for all I care.
2007-07-01 04:42:20
·
answer #8
·
answered by open4one 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
If they are then it's just another example of "do as we say - not as we do"
2007-07-01 06:51:57
·
answer #9
·
answered by one shot 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I like to know about this too, it is hypocrisy
2007-07-01 05:32:19
·
answer #10
·
answered by amtusS 3
·
0⤊
0⤋