2007-07-01 04:38:20 · 8 answers · asked by ? 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Competency. That would be nice for a change.
2007-07-01 04:41:12 · answer #1 · answered by katydid 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Both. A political appointee is supposed to carry out the policies of the person who appoints her/him, and would therefore need to be loyal to that person. Of course, it would be counter productive to appoint someone who is not competent to carry out those policies.
2007-07-01 11:42:25 · answer #2 · answered by Yaktivistdotcom 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
both. think your question out if theres compitance without loyalty theres a good chance your efforts will be undercut if theres loyalty without competance you may as well shoot your own foot
2007-07-01 11:40:37 · answer #3 · answered by NONAME 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
b) competence
2007-07-01 11:44:53 · answer #4 · answered by drayla_nz 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Being loyal is more important .
2007-07-01 11:41:26 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Would you want someone working for you , smarter then you ?
Bush didn't , did he ?
2007-07-01 11:42:11 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
both
2007-07-01 11:41:37 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
B
2007-07-01 11:40:40 · answer #8 · answered by Brian 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋