English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Just saw vision of it on youtube, whatever struck the pentagon certainly didn't look like a plane, no wings!

2007-07-01 03:00:20 · 14 answers · asked by iamaustralian 4 in News & Events Other - News & Events

I'm not trying to insult anyone, was there a plane with passengers aboard who were killed? or only people in the pentagon, which was the exact part of the pentagon that was just under re furbishment at the time.

2007-07-01 03:10:31 · update #1

Also footage on a reputable tv network has been airing this. Not just youtube.
Freezing the frames, it was NOT a plane!

2007-07-01 03:11:36 · update #2

Why can't I ask this question on here?
Is this yahoo only for Americans?
Do you think you are the only country in the world that has suffered loss?
Or are you ignorant?

2007-07-01 03:13:04 · update #3

Hey Jennifer?
You were devastated?
You're not alone, theres a lot more to it.

2007-07-01 03:15:50 · update #4

Thankyou buffmountain.
Your Mr Rumsfeld is as crooked as a dogs hind leg!
So are most politicians, it's the same everywhere!

2007-07-01 03:17:05 · update #5

Jennifer, you poor little girl, why are you so angry?
Calm down, take a chill pill.
It's not that bad!
Now go and see mummy and sit on her knee and have a good little cry.
Ok if it makes you feel better you are the only person in the world that has suffered, you're right I don't know you, and you think you know me?
I asked a question.
You got emotional. Wrong time of the month for you too?

2007-07-01 03:28:37 · update #6

BUFFMOUNTAIN- You rock, you've obviously done your homework, i'll check all of that info out.
Oh yeah and be sure to let little Jennifer know!! LOL

2007-07-01 03:31:43 · update #7

14 answers

Its quite possible even probable that a misslie took out the pentagon.......even Rumsfeld made a booboo and said it was a missile not long before he got the sack.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UFuUGEZ39g8
Eyewitness accounts cannot be believed if they are mere written accounts on the internet, it is far too easy for emotive descriptions to be fabricated and fed to media sources who are all controlled by government groups anyway. As the old saying goes believe nothing of what you overhear and only half of what you see.

Factor in also that the feds and secret service have openly admitted they have 84 security camera tapes from in and around the pentagon, yet all they can show us is 5 doctored frames that dont even show a plane???
Then early this year they made big hoohah about releasing new film from the pentagon. All they did was release the same film with added lens flares to obscure half the screen???? then they tried to bullshit us saying they never released the first version..... yet they were the only ones who had all the film footage!!!! They have been lying since 2001 anyone can see that.

Factor in one more thing; back in the 60's the US was worried about the Russians putting missiles into Cuba, they even drew up plans to explode a passenger jet near Cuba so they could invade.
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/northwoods.html
http://www.wanttoknow.info/010501operationnorthwoods

Here is a snippet from the northwoods report for your perusal.


Pages 10-11 of 15-page GWU file on Northwoods (page 7-8 of Joint Chiefs report)

A series of well coordinated incidents will be planned to take place in and around Guantanamo to give genuine appearance of being done by hostile Cuban forces.

A. Incidents to establish a credible attack:

(1) Start rumors (many). Use clandestine radio
(2) Land friendly Cubans in uniform “over-the-fence” to stage attack on base.
(3) Capture Cuban (friendly) saboteurs inside the base.
(4) Start riots near the base main gate (friendly Cubans).
(5) Blow up ammunition inside the base: start fires.
(6) Burn aircraft on air base (sabotage).
(7) Lob mortar shells from outside of base into base.
(8) Capture assault teams approaching from the sea or vicinity of Guantanamo City.
(9) Capture militia group which storms base.
(10) Sabotage ship in harbor; large fires – naphthalene.
(11) Sink ship near harbor entrance. Conduct funerals for mock-victims.
http://www.propagandamatrix.com/americas_phoney_wars_2.html

2007-07-01 03:15:02 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 4

It was a plane... I've seen all the 911 conspiracy video's and very few of the "facts" they give you are true most are just misleading. It's odd that a building as big and secured as the pentagon wouldn't have more footage of it but it was a plane. The people who boarded that flight never returned. There were tons of eye-witnesses, and there's documented evidence that the plane was flying in the no-fly zone above the pentagon for like 20 min before it went down so if it was a missile how'd they make the plane disappear. Plus look again at the pictures they show you most don't show the outside of the building remember the pentagon has several layers of walls and alot of the pictures show the inside view which the wings of the plane probably wouldn't have made it into because the wall had been recently reinforced..

2007-07-01 04:46:44 · answer #2 · answered by icpooreman 6 · 5 0

It was a plane.

I was working for a congressman at the time. He was there.

I was born and raised in New York. I was at Ground Zero very soon after it happened. Those were planes too.

I'm now a journalist, and let me tell you, I've never seen a single shred of credible evidence to indicate that this was anything other than a terrorist attack carried out by hijackers who commandeered planes and crashed them.

If I had any legitimate reason to believe otherwise (I've seen all the videos and read the books written by conspiracy theorists) you can bet I'd believe it.

It is not a vast conspiracy or an elaborate hoax. A plane crashed into the Pentagon. Two planes crashed into the WTC. Simple as that. I don't know why this is so difficult to understand.


Incidentally, isn't is a little silly to ask a "question" when you already have your mind made up as to what the answer is?

2007-07-01 10:02:33 · answer #3 · answered by Lanani 6 · 4 1

Political Correctness is the Incubator of Islamism
by Amil Imani

14 Feb, 2007

Time and again we are told by the politically correct “experts” not to worry about Islam posing a threat to our way of life. We are repeatedly lectured that only a very small minority of Muslims are troublemakers who are giving the peaceful masses of Muslims a bad name. We are also informed that the terrorists, who happened to be Muslims, are the disaffected and the young. And not to worry, since as the fire of youth turns to ashes of old age the rebellious will mellow, as they always have.
With heavy assurances like this, coming from so many know-it-all authoritative figures, we can sleep soundly without the aid of sleeping pills. After all, people reason that these pundits are “experts” whose job is to know and tell it like it is. Those who voice contrary views must be a bunch of racist, alarmist hate mongers. Who is right?

Wouldn’t be more prudent to let the facts settle the matter, rather than blindly accepting either position? Of course it would, except for one huge problem. In the face of threats, people tend to go to the mind’s medicine cabinet and take a few denial and rationalization pills, in the same way that it is the aspirin bottle they turn to when a headache strikes. Why not? We are the Easy Species. We love effortless, quick and simple solutions. And that’s not invariably bad. It has given us all kinds of labor and time saving devices.

Yet, the Islam problem is very real and deadly. Neither the pronouncements of the experts, nor the tranquilizing pills of the mind can make it go away. It is here and it shows every sign of imposing itself on us.

Europe is already badly infected with Islamism. It is the coal-miners’ canary. It is telling us that the next stop is America. We must act and act now. We must not sacrifice our cherished way of life and the lives of our children at the altar of political correctness: the incubator of Islamofascism.

2007-07-01 10:34:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

examine the value checklist, there is an extremely effective timeline in there describing the total series of activities, which comprise the confusion concerning Flight seventy seven and the air patrols dispatched interior the section from Langley. On a greater everyday observe, the alert status of the Air rigidity substitute into a great deal decreased after the U.S. broke up interior the early 90s. the two the numbers and time constraints have been cut back decrease back appreciably after that. Edit: Wow, yet yet another new missile tale. Will they ever provide up coming up with new, the two amazing thoughts?

2016-10-03 08:23:49 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It was a jet plane. Don't judge by what you was on youtube. The wreckage of the plane was pulled out of the remains of the Pentagon. The damage to the building was in the shape of the fuselage of the plane and the two wings as they sliced into the structure

2007-07-01 09:11:08 · answer #6 · answered by xg6 7 · 5 0

Are U really asking that on here?Yes it was a plane and alot of people lost their lives because of that as so they did in the WTC and Pennslyvania plane crashes due to terroists attack.Please don't believe everything u see on that youtube,it's all a load of bs and shame on them for doing that and U for watching that.Let those poor people rest in peace instead of dancing on their graves please.Im sorry if Im being a bitc* but I saw 9/11 and it was just horrible and that question really will offend alot of people.

Ok just read your little thing about is yahoo for only americans?Well yahoo isn't but let me tell U something about being ignorant little girl?Nobody said that America was the only country that had ever had a devastating loss,however when U get on yahoo and ask that dumb as s question and then still say it was NOT a plane U are going to get alot of people who are angry because the majority of us on here are American and how damn dumb could U possibly be to say it wasn't a plane???Ok then what in the fu** happened to that plane then smart one that killed everyone on board and alot of innocent people in the pentagon??Answer me that U ignorant bitc*!!!

And don't U dare answer me by name on here!!U don't even know me.I know there's alot more to it,I lived it.I actually live in America!!!

Sit on my mummy's knee?? U are a dumb bitc*.No it's not that time of month for me???I don't think I know U and I don't want to know U.My brother died in the WTC attack,what now ass?I didn't say I was the only one devastated either but I lost my older brother girl,how can U be so hateful??

2007-07-01 03:11:34 · answer #7 · answered by Jennifer M 4 · 3 2

So you believe a video on YouTube? Look at the real pics,taken by the news cameras. If it was a missle then what happened to the plane? This is an insult to the families of the victims.

2007-07-01 03:06:27 · answer #8 · answered by ? 5 · 6 2

Global Hawks didnt exist in '01. and they are 1/10 the size of the damage. I feel sorry for you that you picked the delusional answer you did.

2016-04-19 15:00:30 · answer #9 · answered by yankee_sailor 7 · 0 0

buffmountain sums it up.....

I believe they used an unmanned "Global Hawk" that was carrying a missile. The missile was shot first and then the Global Hawk crashed into the building immediately after. What ever recognizable parts were left over from the Global Hawk the Secret Service Men quickly gathered up and carried away underneath a blue tarp.

Make sense now?

2007-07-01 08:23:06 · answer #10 · answered by Honey Girl 3 · 1 5

fedest.com, questions and answers