I sure do.... I was just saying that last nite
2007-07-01 00:47:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by CherryD 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
it's 911 time a million that's right 911 million.... Dude you're an idiot and have totally been watching too much 24.
Which terrorist attacks are a decoy?? 911's the only one I recall on US soil and I'm pretty sure that was the main event. These "terrorists" they arrested in florida were Cubans not terrorists. The "terrorists" they arrested for the supposed plane bombing in Britain were let go because they weren't terrorists. Open your eyes man how many terrorist attacks have taken place on US soil besides 911.
if it makes you feel any better the US allocated over 600 billion dollars to defense spending this year.
2007-07-01 04:56:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by icpooreman 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
These failed attacks, in my opinion, are not decoys, but attempts to hurt the Western world, both in terms of loss of life and economically. They also want to frighten us. You're not alone is believing something bigger is being planned. This is the world we live in and we need to LIVE in it and not spend our days giving terrorists the satisfaction of our emotional reactions to their attacks. This is the result of humanity's hatred for diversity. We had better find ways of solving this problem or eventually our species is going to cease to exist. Killing each other will never be a solution. We need a genius with new ideas to work on solving these problems.
2007-07-01 00:51:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by Elaine P...is for Poetry 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
I have a funny feeling that these "attacks" are just a set up by the government. The government want us to live in fear so they can tax us more and take away our rights all under the banner of "Anti Terrorism" Laws. I am very cynical about this whole War on "terror" hype.
It wouldn't surprise me if in a few weeks we all have to pay a "Security Tax" to go into London.
I was also highly suspicious of the 9/11 attacks as well, they looked a set up, too many things didn't add up.
I hate terrorism but I also totally distrust the government.
2007-07-01 01:57:16
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
No, this isn't a decoy...here is why.
The whole point of "terrorism" is to disrupt everday lives. (Hence the word "terror") So, terrorists bomb small things in England and get everyone scared. Security levels go up and people start being more careful abotu when/where they go out, etc. So, the terrorists accomplished their purpose. Everyone is looking around the next corner for another bomb for for a huge event to happen. This means they have won...
2007-07-01 00:57:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by puppyraiser8 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
Yes you have been watching too much 24...
but it is possible as in 7/7 they may strike again in a couple of weeks or so...
they arent that bright....after the failed London bombs they should have asked why? and left the country or changed strategy...
to go ahead with the Glasgow Attacks has helped the police alot....
thats good for us but shows they are dumb..
2007-07-01 03:06:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by Pandora 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
How is taking action resulting in the security level being raised to critical conducive to creating a decoy for a more concerted/bigger attack ?
So in answer to your question, No.
2007-07-01 02:05:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I'm no terrorist but to me it makes sense that if you want to commit a big attack you should do it when the security level is lower and people aren't expecting it. Right now the UK is at the highest threat level possible which means security is going to be tighter and for them to commit any such attack is going to be much more difficult.
So no i don't think its a decoy
2007-07-01 00:50:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by Stephen M 6
·
5⤊
0⤋
What Stephan M said makes alot of sense but who the heck knows what is going through their evil minds. I am just glad that many people were not harmed or killed. 911 is something that will never leave the minds of Americans and I would hate to see anyone have to go through something even close to that.
edit..icporeman...the first wtc attack when clinton was in office.
2007-07-01 04:32:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by Ladybugs77 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
They only attack when it is least expected or when a back is turned to them. I have noticed that when the UK or the US goes into a heightened state of alert the threat seems to diminish, where as in a lower state of alert, anything could happen with much devastation.
2007-07-02 09:47:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by ringolarry 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
i agree yes.
with all the so called planning that goes into these terrorist attacks i find it hard to believe that something goes wrong in the last few minutes.
surely these people have planned for every eventuality??
i would imagine that they study their target 100% and plan to the very last detail..........
i think they are testing the waters ( so to speak) seeing the responses from the police and working on a must larger attack that could be at anytime!!
either that or they are complete novices just trying to cause as much disruption they can!!
2007-07-01 01:26:03
·
answer #11
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
2⤋