English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

..they want our jobs and do it very well so why not this. India has like a billion people why they could stuff Iraq terrorists in an hour -

Besides, India does have a strong army - they could easily loan like 100,000 soldiers

2007-06-30 21:54:11 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Military

Next time you catch a **** scaling the walls, he could be sent on a long vacation to prove his citizenship - why make all illegals prove their citizenship like in good ol' days

2007-06-30 22:04:00 · update #1

14 answers

Hiring willing foreigners to fight actually probably isn't a bad idea. But they probably wouldn't be as trustworthy as American soldiers. And it's not necessary at the moment. We have enough soldiers to take care of it as it is. Nobody forced them to go; they volunteered to join the Army.

2007-07-01 01:08:57 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

First off their are tons of illegals and they don't involve just Mexicans. Secondly we have tons of Mexican Americans in our armed forces right now. It is our own fault for being in this situation with illegal immagration. The immagration laws are not being enforced, there are a lot of bussinesses that would rather hire cheaper labor, and we should have tightened our borders. Now lets talk about the war. We started a war on the idea that Sadam had illegal weapons. He didn't, but was it really a bad thing to take down someone who tortured and oppressed his own people. This war should have happened for that reason alone. Why can't we have the reputation of being the world police. I am not ashamed of that. Who is going to step up when things go bad again for some other poor country who cannot do anything about their leader. You think the French will help. Our soldiers may have gotten caught raping, torturing, and killing, but we have established a system to try and stop all of that and that is what makes us good and want to point out that service men and women our human too. There our bad people in the military population just like the civilian population. Sadam was above the law and he could get away with anything he did and the people of that coutry could not do anything about it and that is the difference. I don't think it is a good idea to pull out now before Iraq can establish stability. Unless that is you want to go back in the next five years or so, because another dictator took over. Why not stay and make sure things are done right. We need to make sure that they have a good police force, a good stable government, and a good military or we are going to end up going back or the country is going to be one chaotic mess.

2007-07-01 00:09:08 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

There would be major outcry in India about this deployment, their citizen would reject the deployment.

This would be like.......
US who start the war but Indians who get killed.

No other country would like this kind of idea.

Besides many countries inside the Coalition are leaving Iraq, like Denmark and even United Kingdom will pull out almost all of their troops by the end of 2007.

So, Iraq is not an attractive place for anyone

2007-06-30 22:02:57 · answer #3 · answered by RPG-7 2 · 1 0

I think it is a great idea. Someone said on here before and I totally agree with it. Our military is sent all over the world to stop invasions of other countries, why is our so-called president not securing our borders and allowing this invasion especially from the southern border to happen. These are illegals who are coming across a country's borders and should be thought of as terrorists since many have joined with the cartels and terrorism. It is a fact that terrorists are posing as hispanics, learning spanish and coming across the border illegally. It is a matter of national security. Place military at border and give them the right to use weapons on sight. No more illegals coming in then. The border patrol has been cut since obama has taken office. Even old Arnold is asking for more help on the border.

2016-05-20 00:39:15 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I guess for one is because it is not their war and 2 about the Mexicans thing yeah there are a lot of Mexicans fighting over there in Iraq but they are signed on as US troops. Out military is made of lots and lots of nationalities and if you know enlistment requirements it only requires you to be a resident of the US and not a citizen so there are quite a few Mexican citizens right now fighting other there but are American residents.

P.S. its funny how people are looking at this from the political view and not looking at it as a war against terror. I mean yeah its bad and all but once we stop and they don't what is the world gonna do? That's right turn to the good ol USA for help and answers... jeez like that's never happened before...

2007-06-30 22:25:10 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

The very fact India was partitioned was over the differences between the Muslim and Hindu populations. The Indians don't generally don't like Muslims and vice versa so why send them?I'm British but I thought that there were plenty of American troops of Mexican extraction already.It is selfish in the least to start a war then expect people who have nothing to do with it to pick up the pieces for our boys who unlike you are mostly proud of their country and happy to do the job they signed up for.

2007-07-01 00:41:04 · answer #6 · answered by frankturk50 6 · 1 0

I totally agree with the ex-soldier, why should they get involved in a war we never should have been involved in in the first instance. You don't just hand a mistake over to someone just because they have more people, or they have more soldiers. It isn't their war, they weren't stupid enough to start it. I really admire the French for having the bottle to stand up to the US and tell them they were not joining their illegal war. The US and everyone else involved should just admit they can't win this war, and get our people home, where they belong.

2007-06-30 22:05:29 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Well I dont like Mexicans or Indian or even Puerto Ricans either,

But if USA backs out of this now, Thats telling all the other terrorists that its ok to bomb our country and take out our soldiers and that we dont give a damn what happens.
Its not like our soldiers were drafted, they volunteered for this, Encluding my two sons.So, If the American people cant stand behind our troops and support them then get the hell out of America, go to one of these other countries. Im sick of hearing how we should back out of this.American soldiers are going to die, and my sons may even be one of them, but at least there going to die for something worthwhile. There not fighting on our streets over drugs, there not out there robbing banks and being killed, there not out there beating up old people for there social security checks, there out there fighting this war on terror so assholes like you can voice your opinons on how we should win this war and how we should back out of it. Try walking a mile in a AMERICAN SOLDIERS shoes sometimes, Its not a pretty site. So wake up America, Fight for what is ours, and Dont let someone take what is ours, thats our Freedom... Laura Nimitzmom

2007-07-01 03:12:17 · answer #8 · answered by Laura 2 · 1 1

Im Mexican and Ive deployed to Iraq 3 times as a US SOLDIER, I wish no harm on anyone. The US military today has thousands, and thousands, of Mexicans fighting for the USA. We fight so that racist M*****F****** like you can speak your mind. So thank you for your support.

2007-07-01 08:33:32 · answer #9 · answered by C.A.G 2 · 0 1

Probably because their governments are smart enough to not get involved in a quagmire that we never should have been involved in in the first place.

2007-06-30 21:58:15 · answer #10 · answered by Bostonian In MO 7 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers