Your opinions please................?

Question

Was Lee Harvey Oswald the lone killer of JFK or was there a conspiracy?

Give your reasons and who you think really did it.

Linda, could you give more details please. I want to hear your opinion on who you think did this.

More research by some is what I'm trying to get out of some of the people here.

I saw the movie JFK and some of it has added parts. Bill Broussard was not the name of the lawyer (the actual lawyer refused to have his name associated with the film).

Willie O'Keefe is a fictional character as well.

George DeMohrnschildt is not. He was a member of the Dallas Petroleum Club and we know what other politicians have ties to oil.

DeMohrnschildt also tied Oswald to the Rifle but the rifle was a very poor quality rifle and Oswald wasn't a very good shot.

DeMohrnschildt also knew George Bush although Bush, Sr. will say that there was another man in the CIA with that name.

Look into Operation Paperclip and you'll find even more disturbing information.

Just wanted to throw these things out there to see if I could get people to dig deeper and see how JFK relates to today's war.

Answer 1

Could not have been done the way the Warren Commission said. I have been to the site. Stood at the window, sighted the yellow dots indicating where shots hit and then walked the street.
A moving car accellerating on a curve up to 30 - 40 mph, would be very hard to hit ONCE with a cheap bolt action rifle tricked out with a scope with poor eye relief. From that vantage point not one person in 1000 could have managed it.
Not even trained snipers.

Also: the Zapruder film shows Kennedy being struck from the front, not behind.
______________
This was hit.
My guess is Rogue CIA elements aided by oranized crime did it. Allen Dulles never did forgive Kennedy for calling off the Bay of Pigs invasion in 1960. Funny how conviently Jack Ruby died after he killed Oswald.
There was a lot of " english " on that one bullet that entered two people and killed one of them.
Not buying the " official " story for a second.
Cubans may have been involved as well.

Answer 2

it's like this, every scientific and official study done has come to the same conclusion. and that conclusion is oswald acted alone. hollywood and conspiricy theorists come up with entirely different conclusions. it's important to remember the motives of these two "study groups". on the one hand you have people interested in profiting off various theories and on the other hand, people exploring those theories and looking for the truth.

SO where i do not believe in most of the various theories out there and do believe oswald could have acted alone, i cannot say i am certain of that fact.

i mean kennedy had some powerful enemies. the mob in chicago, cuba and castro, the entire millitary-industrial complex, as well as the cia for gods sake.

however, if i had to say, i would say oswald did in fact act alone. and i would give that answer a 15% confidence factor...(i.e. i have no idea).

Answer 3

I'm sure he wasn't the only shooter, but it is probable that he fired at least two of the shots that hit the presidental limo. As for whether there was a conspiracy, of course there was, and it was the mob behind it. The CIA was given free reign after the Bay of Pigs invasion, and the military industrial complex (which doesn't really exist anyway) was making millions off of Vietnam. These people had no reason to kill Kennedy. The mafia put him into the oval office, and he sent his brother after them.

Answer 4

I believe Gerald Ford may have been the last to know either way.

I have been there twice. Their was way to many people in a small space to not see or hear shots from another direction. Seen the video shown on the History Channel more than once. The animation work they did seems to support the Lone Gunman theory. There was audio from a MC cop but it was not conclusive.

The theory of people being killed to keep the silence has disproved as well.

Answer 5

The only shooter was Oswald, he killed Kennedy. Whether he was acting on his own or at the behest of others is still debatable, since he didn't survive long enough to be tried. Jack Ruby did complicate things a bit when he shot Oswald, and opened the door for an almost endless string of conspiracy theories. Why did Ruby shoot Oswald? Was he acting on his own or even at the behest of those who ordered Oswald to shoot Kennedy? Too many questions, and not enough answers. The only thing that I am sure of in all this is that Oswald shot Kennedy.

Answer 6

Based upon the film of the shooting, and having been a sniper during my Army days, If Kennedy was struck from behind with a high powered weapon in the skull, he would have pitched forward, as he did when the first shot hit him in the back, and traveled to Connelly's back, who also pitched forward.
Kennedy was shot in the head from a forward position, striking him in the left side of his forhead above his right eye. he flew backward, and blood spray went to the side....not FORWARD!

Answer 7

I think it really doesn't matter anymore. There are much more pressing concerns for us to give thought to. But I will say, that nothing is as it seems. And I wouldn't be at all surprised to find out that there was a "conspiracy" going on.

Answer 8

always a great topic............he was the scape goat..this conspiracy worked to perfection because we are and always will debate this...the thing that convinced me was if you are shot in the front of your head then your head will react to the opposite direction, as it did

Answer 9

Lee was shooting blanks...I popped Kennedy from the grassy knoll...but no one will believe me!

Oh well...actually I was trying to shoot off Jackie's pink hat

Answer 10

i really think that hoover had a dog that could shoot a pistol and he was in the car all along and no one ever noticed

reason,,,,,why not ,,it is as good as any ones