2007-06-30 03:35:05 · 9 answers · asked by ? 7 in Family & Relationships ➔ Singles & Dating
no.. but it helps to look forward to seeing them. there are many things that indicate love. one is wanting the best for that person.. putting them first.. over looking some little faults.. feeling good about yourself... because of the way this person treats you. feeling loved by that person.. lots and lots of stuff.
2007-06-30 03:39:39 · answer #1 · answered by foosieboy1953 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not really. I've been REALLY excited about seeing someone or getting to spend time with them, but not have known them well enough for love to have developed.
It does mean you are fond of that person...you at last like them, probably are infatuated with them if you haven't known them long and feel that way, or love could be there. It really depends on how well and how long you've known them...if love has had time to develop.
Love is great...but every positive emotion isn't love. âº
2007-06-30 10:40:21 · answer #2 · answered by . 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
well, when you are super eager to be with a person, it means that you just want him to love you and you dont want him to date anyone else. dont rush because it will only make the relationship move faster and it might not result in the way you want it to be. it might mean you just want him, but not truly love him. good luck with that.
2007-06-30 11:06:29 · answer #3 · answered by mrizsuki 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, it's lust. If a guy calls you and says, "I'm sorry I have to break our date, we'll go out next weekend instead." and you don't have a full blown fit, then it's really love and not lust.
2007-06-30 10:38:38 · answer #4 · answered by janicajayne 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, I don't think so. There is a need to strike correct chemistry between both of us.
2007-06-30 14:05:45 · answer #5 · answered by VINU 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
it may also indicate a crush that will soon pass.
2007-06-30 10:38:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
not necessarily love..can be mere lust
2007-06-30 10:38:14 · answer #7 · answered by aqua 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
not necessarily.
2007-06-30 11:02:05 · answer #8 · answered by frescocomolluvias 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i don't think so
2007-07-01 03:26:51 · answer #9 · answered by Albert einstein 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋