Alarmist Global Warming Claims Melt
Under Scientific Scrutiny ---
By James M. Taylor --- Chicago Sun-Times --- 30 June 07
In his new book, The Assault on Reason, Al Gore pleads, "We must stop
tolerating the rejection and distortion of science. We must insist on an end
to the cynical use of pseudo-studies known to be false for the purpose of
intentionally clouding the public's ability to discern the truth." Gore
repeatedly asks that science and reason displace cynical political posturing
as the central focus of public discourse.
If Gore really means what he writes, he has an opportunity to make a
difference by leading by example on the issue of global warming.
A cooperative and productive discussion of global warming must be open and
honest regarding the science. Global warming threats ought to be studied and
mitigated, and they should not be deliberately exaggerated as a means of
building support for a desired political position.
Many of the assertions Gore makes in his movie, ''An Inconvenient Truth,''
have been refuted by science, both before and after he made them. Gore can
show sincerity in his plea for scientific honesty by publicly acknowledging
where science has rebutted his claims.
For example, Gore claims that Himalayan glaciers are shrinking and global
warming is to blame. Yet the September 2006 issue of the American
Meteorological Society's Journal of Climate reported, "Glaciers are growing
in the Himalayan Mountains, confounding global warming alarmists who
recently claimed the glaciers were shrinking and that global warming was to
blame."
Gore claims the snowcap atop Africa's Mt. Kilimanjaro is shrinking and that
global warming is to blame. Yet according to the November 23, 2003, issue of
Nature magazine, "Although it's tempting to blame the ice loss on global
warming, researchers think that deforestation of the mountain's foothills is
the more likely culprit. Without the forests' humidity, previously
moisture-laden winds blew dry. No longer replenished with water, the ice is
evaporating in the strong equatorial sunshine."
Gore claims global warming is causing more tornadoes. Yet the United Nations
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change stated in February that there has
been no scientific link established between global warming and tornadoes.
Gore claims global warming is causing more frequent and severe hurricanes.
However, hurricane expert Chris Landsea published a study on May 1
documenting that hurricane activity is no higher now than in decades past.
Hurricane expert William Gray reported just a few days earlier, on April 27,
that the number of major hurricanes making landfall on the U.S. Atlantic
coast has declined in the past 40 years. Hurricane scientists reported in
the April 18 Geophysical Research Letters that global warming enhances wind
shear, which will prevent a significant increase in future hurricane
activity.
Gore claims global warming is causing an expansion of African deserts.
However, the Sept. 16, 2002, issue of New Scientist reports, "Africa's
deserts are in 'spectacular' retreat . . . making farming viable again in
what were some of the most arid parts of Africa."
Gore argues Greenland is in rapid meltdown, and that this threatens to raise
sea levels by 20 feet. But according to a 2005 study in the Journal of
Glaciology, "the Greenland ice sheet is thinning at the margins and growing
inland, with a small overall mass gain." In late 2006, researchers at the
Danish Meteorological Institute reported that the past two decades were the
coldest for Greenland since the 1910s.
Gore claims the Antarctic ice sheet is melting because of global warming.
Yet the Jan. 14, 2002, issue of Nature magazine reported Antarctica as a
whole has been dramatically cooling for decades. More recently, scientists
reported in the September 2006 issue of the British journal Philosophical
Transactions of the Royal Society Series A: Mathematical, Physical, and
Engineering Sciences, that satellite measurements of the Antarctic ice sheet
showed significant growth between 1992 and 2003. And the U.N. Climate Change
panel reported in February 2007 that Antarctica is unlikely to lose any ice
mass during the remainder of the century.
Each of these cases provides an opportunity for Gore to lead by example in
his call for an end to the distortion of science. Will he rise to the
occasion? Only time will tell.
2007-07-02 02:11:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by hitech.man 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
global warming
global warming is an increase in average temperature of the earths atmosphere.we are putting large amounts of carbon dioxide into the air, and it "blankets" up in the atmosphere trapping warm air in the earth.
global warming is melting the artic. the artic is the earths natural air conditioner. without the earth will become unbearibly hotter. if the artic fully melts the ocean will rise 20 feet. think of every foot of the ocean having an extra 20 feet of water on it. places will flood. one place in india, home to 60 million people will flood. the world trait centre memorial would be under water. in the year 2050 it is estimated the artic will be ful,ly melted . huge amounts of people will be starving and looking for a home. a million species of animals will be extinct.
things you can do:
-change a regular lightbulb to a compact florescent lightbulb
-walk instead of driving more often
-for your washing maching use cold water instead of hot
-install a low flow shower head for your shower
global warming is not a joke. be part of the solution, not part of the problem!
2007-07-02 05:13:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hello,
Scientisis and seismicologists predict that if humans continue to POLLUTE the earth's atmosphere in the current manner and rate.
There would be a severe increase in the affects of Global Warming.
For example, more Floods/Tsunamis,' Earthquakes, Droughts, and Hurricanes worldwide.
Some say this is DOOMS DAY fatalism. But I say vehemently, that this information is as TRUE as it gets.
Bringbaka.
NYC.
2007-06-30 02:31:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by BringBaka 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
The US House of Representatives has passed a bill stating that man made global warming is real, and providing money to develop ways to reduce it. The vote was almost 2-1, which is a large margin.
http://www.reuters.com/article/environmentNews/idUSN2743018620070627
2007-06-30 02:06:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by Bob 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Extremely critical time frame's, Arctic (my home) now two third's melted (won't affect us severely) antarctic starting to flow into ocean at faster and dangerously large mass of iceberg's, (glaciated ice)....It's for sure the most dangerous manking has ever come to sniffing out civilization, next to air toxicity the antarctic mass melting mean's the city's of the world will all have to move, and you know yourself people are basically selfish and would resist any change that isn't their's.
2007-06-30 02:11:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by willoyaboy 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Search Google for the latest.
2007-06-30 07:00:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by jdkilp 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
People are trying to help and so are companies by using environmental friendly products. They say if this carries on, the hole in the ozone layer will be repaired ........ eventually !
2007-06-29 22:13:51
·
answer #7
·
answered by Ash 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
bad news:
floods in south asia, australia and britain
droughts everywhere
lack of fresh water
rise of food price
malaria arrives to new areas
GHG emissions don´t stop
good news:
more and more people world wide want to stop this foolness
more and more windmills and solar farms produce electricity world wide
thousands hybrid and hydrogen cars are sold everyday in some countries
2007-06-29 22:49:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by carmenl_87 3
·
3⤊
1⤋