lol, that got your attention. But seriously why does everyone believe what Darwin said just because he wrote it down. Nearly 150 after his book was published it is still a theory. Why not believe Bible it makes more sense than a big bang?
2007-06-29
18:27:58
·
20 answers
·
asked by
tolerance-Jn3:16,Acts2:38
2
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
yes I do realize that the Big Bang and Evolution are two separate theories. I also realize that there is a difference between theory and fact no matter how much evolutionists want to say otherwise. And please don't give me the "the Bible is unfair" If I tell you my house is on narrow way and if you go down Broadway you'll fall off a cliff you going on Broadway is not my fault. There is proof that the Bible is true; the Bible has been the map of archaeologist for centuries. How many ancient civilizations have been found that only the Bible had recorded?
2007-07-02
09:43:52 ·
update #1
Okay, just be logical for a moment. Everybody know that we are more than "flesh and blood" we have personalities and ideas and feelings these indicate the existence of an "us" that is "extra-physical"-a soul, if you will. saying the Bible is false and evolution is true does deny the existence of God. Because don't you think an all-powerful God would give us some kind of Word from Himself? And God intangible? You must be joking. However, even if all a you were right and somewhere in the universe millions of years ago someone threw the cosmic dice and here we are today, I have nothing to worry about, but if I'm right you have Eternity to worry about, my advice,take narrow Way like He said(acts 2:38). Also less time witnessing? witnessing is the great commission. I will declare His Name until I leave this world. Make no mistake people, there is a God and He will judge the quick(alive) and the dead.
2007-07-02
10:13:05 ·
update #2
I believe the Bible. Not Darwin.
2007-06-29 18:32:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by Dark Angel 3
·
1⤊
3⤋
I believe in Darwinism and the theory of Evolution not simply because it was written down by Charles Darwin, but because there is an insanely large amount of evidence supporting it, which can be found at http://www.talkorigins.org/origins/faqs-evolution.html, not only that, but many predictions that the theory of Evolution has made have proven to be true, http://www.don-lindsay-archive.org/creation/evo_science.html.
By saying that it's "still a theory" You act as if theorys can become "scientific facts", which isn't true. Here is the definition of Scientific theory from Wikipedia. "In scientific usage, a theory does not mean an unsubstantiated guess or hunch, as it can in everyday speech. A theory is a logically self-consistent model or framework for describing the behavior of a related set of natural or social phenomena. It originates from or is supported by experimental evidence (see scientific method). In this sense, a theory is a systematic and formalized expression of all previous observations that is predictive, logical and testable."
The Bible does not make more sense than the Big Bang. The Bible is loaded with contradiction, absurdity, and claims supported by no evidence. Let's not forget that by following the Bible, you would be advocating the death of 90% of America, including people who work on Sunday, disobeying children, and people who follow other religions, and encourage you to do so as well.
Creationism is supported by no evidence, evolution has oh so much evidence supporting it. Oh, and evolution does not always lead believing in the Big Bang. Plenty of theistic evolutionists most likely don't believe in the Big Bang. This is of course a denial of the evidence supporting it, but it refutes your misconception that somehow you have to believe in the Big Bang to believe in evolution. The theory of evolution says nothing about the existance of a God/Gods.
2007-06-29 18:30:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
1⤋
Science is science based on evidence not just theory.
A Theory is not a belief system.
Religion is based on faith and works ie doing good deeds etc. Religion is an outer expression of Faith which ideally a relationship with the Divine.
Theology not theory!
Please keep the two separate!
Ignorance is not Apostolic!
Please spend the summer reading up on basic logic and science or possibly reading the dictionary. Especially the definitions of theory and faith.
2007-06-29 18:44:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by JeeVee 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Even Darwin had doubts about his own theory because of the complexity of organisms. And back then, they didn't know about DNA and many other things - imagine what he would have to say about evolution now! Atheists cling to this theory though because in their mind it refutes the bible (even though there is no evidence for this theory - never has been, never will be, and they'll discover in the end how silly they are). They worship this theory like it's their religion, and defend it as religiously as you or I would defend Christianity.
2007-06-29 18:32:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by Avery 1
·
2⤊
2⤋
well what is written in the bible is a theory too... all religions are theorys...
I have no religion... I am agnostic... I cant stand how people with religions can be so hypocritical, and naive... and I wanted no part of it...
Would you say that believing in a god, that is intangible, and cannot be proven is more sense?
I cannot prove the big bang, and I cant prove anything in the bible... I find them both ridiculously stupid...
2007-06-29 18:33:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
The Bible makes more sense? have you read the first two books? there's already a contradiction in that! were they made at the same time or not? at least in Darwin was consistent! his theory only makes sense because of that!
2007-06-30 15:04:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by Bohemian 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Science is Science. Religion is Religion. Two different purposes that don't have to contradict eachother. Therefore, one can believe in the Bible and accept Evolution. In the end, the most important aspect of our lives is Jesus Christ and not evolution! GOd bless.
2007-06-29 18:32:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
You do realize that evolution and the Big Bang are two entirely different theories, right?
And why should we believe your book of mythology over a proven theory?
2007-06-29 18:31:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by Kharm 6
·
4⤊
1⤋
The ToE has 175 years of unrelentingly solid positive evidence, observation, testing, retesting, practical application, peer-review... and is now backed-up by the somewhat out-of-left-field data from DNA sequencing (and absolutely NO challenges!). And no one ‘believes’ the ToE, but we simply accept it as FACT. Once you know it well, it’s easy to accept. Darwin’s On the Origin of Species is a good start. ... And "theory"? ... Please... It's also a FACT.
*Your* book just makes NO SENSE AT ALL. The ‘Holy’ Bible advocates the KILLING of 2/3s of ALL HUMANITY – me, just because I accept tons of scientific evidence over *zero* evidence of any of humanity’s silly “Gods.”
( In Any SANE Society, The Bible Would NOT BE READ. )
2007-06-29 18:30:13
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
You obviously know little about science or Darwin. No one "believes" science because someone wrote it; theories are tested and falsified or verified. The basics of Darwin's work are so heavily verified that only very ignorant people do not accept them - which, sadly, includes too many here in the USA because religious fanatics prevent science from being well-taught in most schools.
2007-06-29 18:33:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by Brent Y 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
They don't believe it because he write it down! They believe it because what he wrote down has been largely supported by mountains of evidence during 150 years of subsequent intense scientific investigation! And the Big Bang has absolutely nothing to do with Darwin.
2007-06-29 18:33:29
·
answer #11
·
answered by PaulCyp 7
·
2⤊
1⤋