Something that is omnipresent and unproven is and oximoron, which means one of them must dont be true.
I trust the scientist, becuase i know they're real.
2007-06-29 18:13:23 · 29 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I don't know why God hasn't proven God's own existance, just to settle it. ; )
2007-06-29 18:17:04 · answer #1 · answered by Always Curious 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yeah, you have a point. I mean, scientists can be trusted because they proved in the Holocaust that Jews and Blacks were the lowest life-forms.
Science cannot prove everything. And the Holocaust goes on to prove that scientists can be wrong.
God can't be proven scientifically. I'm a Christian, and I will admit that. Looking at the "proof" that science has offered as to why life exists, how it got here, and all that other jazz, the odds are stacked against it extremely.
So trust science...Hitler did and he turned out okay.
2007-06-29 18:17:58 · answer #2 · answered by Mr. A 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
God is a spirit; therefore, science would need to be able to detect a spirit in order to "prove" God.
Can science prove that an idea exists? Science might be able to prove that someone is thinking (with an EEG), but I do not think that it could prove or disprove that an idea exists, though theoretically, an idea could exist anywhere and everywhere.
We have revelation to tell us about God and we also have indirect cumulative evidence, such as: the factors described by the anthropic principle, the existence of DNA, and the several "big bangs" (the creation of the universe, the creation of matter and the existence of order, the creation of biological life, the creation of thinking creatures, and the existence of ethical and moral truth).
2007-06-29 18:29:20 · answer #3 · answered by Scott 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If one of them is untrue, then its the term unproven, because several scientists have renounced their atheists believes because of the scientific proof of God's existence and the available proof of the truth of the Bible, His word. So if you're going to the trust the scientists...then it just matters which one. You should check out Lee Strobel's books. A Case for Christ, A Case for Faith, A Case for A Creator...their might be more. These books are from a very logical and evidence-based point of view.
2007-06-29 18:18:25 · answer #4 · answered by jassie192000 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Who made the scientist that you trust so much? Science cannot prove the Beginning either. A scientist that I trusted told me once that science can see Reaction, but not Action. For Every action there is a reaction right? Going far back enough, only reactions can be seen. What about that first Action?
2007-06-29 18:18:23 · answer #5 · answered by Starjumper the R&S Cow 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I have a question for you, How does a scientist know how big the earth is, or how old the world is, or even how the weather or wind, works? he cant we only know sooo much, I could say the weather is controlled by how far the moon is from the earth, but i cant prove that for sure, unless i were to change the moons orbit, you know what i mean? its all about faith
2007-06-30 20:10:16 · answer #6 · answered by Brian L 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because science by definition is the study of the natural world in natural terms. Nothing supernatural falls within the purview of science. Therefore Science can never make any statement about God one way or the other.
2007-06-29 18:23:45 · answer #7 · answered by PaulCyp 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
God is supernatural. Science only deals with the laws of nature. God is not bound by the laws of nature. So naturally science cannot prove a God that goes beyond the scientific qualities. God does not have mass or density or neutrons or atoms.
2007-06-29 18:19:49 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
According to the laws of physics every action must have an equal and opposite reaction. man is a reaction therefore we must have had an action to cause us. Even if you were to say it was a big bang the Big bang needs a cause which needs no cause: God. However, since God is the cause he makes the rules His book says he created us, I'll take His word over a labcoat anyday
2007-06-29 18:18:56 · answer #9 · answered by tolerance-Jn3:16,Acts2:38 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Ok, seriously, you have NO idea what you are talking about. Scientists have gone and TRIED to find ways to prove God is not real and then in fact, they find things that prove He IS REAL. Go google it before you come up here hypocritically.
2007-06-29 18:17:44 · answer #10 · answered by Sunshine Face 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Albert Einstein was one of our most talked about scientists to date. He was Jewish and much of his work was to prove GOD. He was also a Pantheist and a very spiritual and religious man yet not a christian. Go to spacemotion.com to find out more about Albert/ Science and GOD.
2007-06-29 19:22:53 · answer #11 · answered by Beneplacitum 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋