Not all stations are called union stations. The term union is included in a station's name only when it served more than one railroad (at the time it was built) and often times these stations were financed by all of the railroads using the building. Here in the U.S. the union term remains with the station's name mostly just for historical and sentimental purposes as most still standing, outside of large metropolitan cities (like New York and Los Angeles), are served only by Amtrak today (if at all).
2007-06-29 16:53:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by Alco83 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
Not all. A "Union station" is ( was ) served ,by most of the railroads serving a particular city.
Washington Union Station., for example.
Others were named for the Railroad which served it or a street, or a particular part of the city.
New York - Penn Station
Philadelphia - 30th Street Station
Boston - North Station South Station, =
(Not very imanginative, is it?))
Here's some more interesting info.
2007-06-29 18:45:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by Barry auh2o 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Trains were an extremely, extremely integral part of linking the two Northern countries in North America. Therefore many stations along trans-continental lines were to unite the States or all of Canada.
Obviously there were unions also working (and many dying to build some of these lines). If you find some cities off of the beaten trail in terms of traditional trading cities in times past, they probably have stations with other names.
2007-06-29 16:45:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by Menasor 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Union Pacific Railroad
on the east coast lots are called Penn Station from the old Pennsylvania Railroad.
So .... they have history
2007-06-30 02:06:39
·
answer #4
·
answered by Michael M 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
some are called the Onion station
2007-06-29 16:39:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
There not where did you hear that.
2007-06-29 16:35:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by Flat_out_Bob 7
·
1⤊
0⤋