Is Darwinism a Religion?

Question

The theory of evolution has been around for 150 years, and has had a great influence on the way people look at the world. It proposes the lie that they came into this world as the result of chance and that they are a "species of animal." Furthermore, it teaches them that the only law in life is a selfish struggle for survival and to stay alive. The effects of this idea can be clearly seen in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries: people's increasing selfishness, the moral degeneration in society, the rapid spread of self-interest, ruthlessness, and violence, the development of totalitarian and bloody ideologies such as fascism and communism, social and individual crises as people grow distant from the morality of religion.

The social results of the theory of evolution have been examined in other books of this author. (see Harun Yahya's The Disasters Darwinism Brought to Humanity, Communism Lies in Ambush, The Dark Spell of Darwinism, and The Religion of Darwinism). It is revealed in these books that this theory, which claims to be "scientific," actually has no scientific basis at all, that it is a scenario stubbornly defended in the face of all the facts, consisting of nothing but superstitions.

It is essential that those who wish to learn about the true nature of the theory of evolution and the Darwinian "worldview" that has systematically dragged the world towards violence, savagery, ruthlessness, and conflict for the last 150 years turn to those books.

This part will consider the invalidity of the theory of evolution at a more general level. Evolutionists' claims on certain matters will be responded to with questions that are frequently asked, the meanings of which are not entirely understood.

Answer 1

you are right it is a dogma if you challange you are called stupid. you have ever major darwinist saying the fossill record does not show evolution. (which Dawkins has stated that evolution is not wrong , but the fossill record.)




And we find many of them already in an advanced state of evolution, the very first time they appear. It is as though they were just planted there, without any evolutionary history. Needless to say, this appearance of sudden planting has delighted creationists". Richard Dawkins, The Blind Watchmaker (New York: W.W. Norton Co., 1987).
The fossil record with its abrupt transitions offers no support for gradual change ........ All palaeontologists know that the fossil record contains precious little in the way of intermediate forms; transitions between major groups are characteristically abrupt" (Gould, 1977).
which Dawkins ripped for Gould for saying this , he said it was giving the enmies arms againtist evolution.
know that, at least in paleoanthropology, data are still so sparse that theory heavily influences interpretations. Theories have, in the past, clearly reflected our current ideologies instead of actual data." Dr David Pilbeam (Physical Anthropologist, Yale University, USA), 'Rearranging our family tree'. Human Nature, June 1978, p. 45.
Biologists are simply naive when they talk about experiments designed to test the theory of evolution. It is not testable. They may happen to stumble across facts which would seem to conflict with its predictions. These facts will invariably be ignored and their discoverers will undoubtedly be deprived of continuing research grants." Professor Whitten (Professor of Genetics, University of Melbourne, Australia), 1980 Assembly Week address.


. we can not have evolved from apes or any other creature, dna shows that .a chance of a mutition being able to reproduce is 10 to the 80th power. but the dogma of evolution has such a stranglehold on some people. so evolution has now has to stand that the supernatural had to happen for evolution to result.

Answer 2

People who believe in evolution do not use "survival of the fittest" in their everyday lives. They are as compassionate as anybody.

Evolution, unlike religion, has been backed up by scientific evidence from diverse and well-respected groups, and can be defended with common-sense logic.

Evolutionists do not pray to Darwin, nor do they base their life around his ideals.

Get you facts straight.

"...actually has no scientific basis at all, that it is a scenario stubbornly defended in the face of all the facts, consisting of nothing but superstitions.

It is essential that those who wish to learn about the true nature of the theory of evolution and the Darwinian "worldview" that has systematically dragged the world towards violence, savagery, ruthlessness, and conflict for the last 150 years turn to those books."

This quote sound to me like a particularly apt description of CHristian fundamentalism, not Darwinism.

Answer 3

I looked up religion, and my Oxford College dictionary uses the word, "supernatural" in the definition.

So, no.

Although, I do enjoy the irony of you explaining WHY evolution is a religion by claiming that it's caused a moral decline, and using the assertion of its status as a religion to discredit it.

Answer 4

A very naive attempt to promote creationist fiction, and sell books from an unknown author who is certainly a creationist himself. Good laugh, but no sale .

Answer 5

A long question with a short answer:

"Yes"

Pastor Art

Answer 6

Yes (thinly disguised as science - I am great at science)

Answer 7

Are you asking a question or making a statement?Seems you answered your own question.

Answer 8

if a religion can sustain itself with out dogma ...... then yes it is

Answer 9

Absolutly not, it is a fact!