'Pope' is such a sucky one to go for. He's one of the champions, and certainly one of the best qualified.
CD
2007-06-29 12:50:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by Super Atheist 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Disagree. I have actually found they like Sam Harris more. Its kinda funny, it seems like the more illogical someone is the more they are revered by the Atheists.... I mean Dawkins is one of the top scientists in the world they say but he has elementary school logic, very very poor. Harris is even less.
Personally I prefer reading Thomas Paine any day above any Atheist writers. The Atheist writers just seem to be extremely illogical. Paine has some logic, and some very poor logic, but overall he makes a much better case than I have seen in any number of Atheists combined.
2007-06-29 19:54:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
I dont think so, i like the atheist pope more then mr dawkins
2007-06-29 19:47:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
doubt it...I think every one has heard of the Pope, but I've Richard Dawkins...
2007-06-29 19:48:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I disagree, but as a non-atheist, I will donate to the hat fund.
2007-06-29 19:47:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by LabGrrl 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Atheists don't have a pope, silly!
2007-06-29 19:47:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Atheists don't need a Patriarchal figure. They are happy enough.
2007-06-29 19:50:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by Link , Padawan of Yoda 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
If you mean in a religious context no because science doesn't rely on faith, it relies on evidence. If you mean conceptually yeah, i guess he would be.
2007-06-29 19:47:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by meissen97 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
No.
The only people who believe fancy clothes make you anything are religious not intelligent.
2007-06-29 19:48:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
He would hate the title,defining him by his disbeliefs.
2007-06-29 19:49:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋