Hamas has made their position very clear about Israel can never be recognised and must be destroyed completely by any means necessary. Fatah "seems" a little more refined which is one reason they are dangerous because they are more subtle and diplomatic in their terrorism. Who is worse, the enemy that openly declares themselves as one or the enemy that will shake your hand and kiss your cheek? Why?
2007-06-29
12:43:35
·
7 answers
·
asked by
shrugger
4
in
Politics & Government
➔ Military
krollo....the problem is that Hamas is the elected government and Fatah is not moderate. The perception that they are moderate is a smoke and mirrors media production. The Al-Aska martyrs brigade is a militant Fatah faction that is responsible for every suicide bombing in Israel for the past two years. The negotiation table is for the media and the Martyrs Brigade for the agenda. Frankly, I would rather see Hamas be in charge so there can be military retaliation against a sanctioned government rather than a bunch of ragtag terrorists running around that could be anybody.
2007-06-29
12:58:05 ·
update #1
krollo....one more thing.......Fatah wants to stay in power but couldn't last a week against Hamas.Again, Fatah is not the desired government of the Palestinians. It is an illegal obligarchy that has siezed opportunity. Neither Fatah or Hamas has an airforce, navy or tank division. Israel does and could retake Gaza in less than 12 hours and completely destroy the Hamas infrastructure within 24. Of coarse Fatah is going to want to be chummy with Israel because "an enemy of an enemy is a friend" and Isreal can be the bad guy for killing Hamas but what happens after the common enemy is destroyed? Fatah trying to make it Israel and Jordan's problem is a pollitical and media move, not a reason to automatically support Fatah. Let's not forget, we are talking about the political party of Yassir Arafat and Barghouti.
2007-06-29
13:24:47 ·
update #2