They are the same as far as I am concerned
2007-06-29 12:32:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by Roy 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Interestingly, the "Big Bang" theory was proposed by a RCC priest/physicist in the first half of the 20th century for the purpose of establishing a theory of creation that allowed for a creator. Einstein and other top physicists denounced the theory roundly, firmly convinced of the so-called Steady-State theory. When Hubble later discovered (and proved) that space objects were moving away from each other at a tremendous speed, the Big Bang caught on.
The Big Bang certainly does not preclude God's creation. It *almost* requires it. The difficulty *some* people have is the literal reading of 7 literal (24-hour) days involved in the creation. The answer: we can be pretty certain that God did not create the Sun on the 4th day, after three previous days and nights, just to "rule over" the day. The Genesis account of creation was written by Moses who did not possess concepts like galaxy and big bang and star=sun. He wrote as he understood it.
Another interesting thing is the Genesis account of the creation of life, which corresponds *nearly* 100% with evolution-believing scientists as far as the order of animal creation. For people who are willing to accept that the sun could not actually have been made three days and nights into creation, the fact that God created the cosmos, the earth, and the life on it - through whatever means - is quite well-confirmed by science, or at least not refuted.
A final thought: evolution is still an unprovable theory. If you happen upon people arguing over evolution, just let them know this. I can't figure out why it is taught as absolute truth in our schools. It *is* a persuasive theory, but it *is* *still* only a theory.
2007-06-29 12:27:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by JimPettis 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
The big bang theory postulates a possible origin of our expanding universe. It is different than the various theories of the origin of life.
A good scientist doesn't "believe" a theory because that would suggest that he disregards evidence to the contrary. We do not.
Creationism postulates. God created the earth, night and day, the stars, the plants and animals, and finally adam and even in the course of seven days, as recorded in the bible.
The evidence to support the theory of creationism can only be found in the book of Genesis.
2007-06-29 12:23:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Big Bang= the universe suddenly burst forth from a very very small densly packed mass containing all the elements. Expanding from a central point out ward eventually cooling and settling into what we see today. Nut shell version.
The Big Bang Theory is the dominant scientific theory about the origin of the universe. According to the big bang, the universe was created sometime between 10 billion and 20 billion years ago from a cosmic explosion that hurled matter and in all directions.
In 1927, the Belgian priest Georges Lemaître was the first to propose that the universe began with the explosion of a primeval atom. His proposal came after observing the red shift in distant nebulas by astronomers to a model of the universe based on relativity. Years later, Edwin Hubble found experimental evidence to help justify Lemaître's theory. He found that distant galaxies in every direction are going away from us with speeds proportional to their distance.
The big bang was initially suggested because it explains why distant galaxies are traveling away from us at great speeds. The theory also predicts the existence of cosmic background radiation (the glow left over from the explosion itself). The Big Bang Theory received its strongest confirmation when this radiation was discovered in 1964 by Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson, who later won the Nobel Prize for this discovery.
Although the Big Bang Theory is widely accepted, it probably will never be proved; consequentially, leaving a number of tough, unanswered questions.
2007-06-29 12:20:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by easyericlife 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
God created the Big Bang, and because a Supreme Being caused it, it is called "The Big Bang". If nature and coincidence made it happen, it would instead be called "The Little Burp"
2007-06-29 12:19:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I belive that God made us all in the beginning of time. The "big bang" was a mass of super dense matter that one day exploded and made every thing. It later made water that poured on earth and bacteria formed wich now have evolved to humans and every other form of life. nonsense...
2007-06-29 12:18:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
God is imaginary no one ever proved he exists. We know the Earth is millions of years old and so is the universe. Therefore the bible is obviously full of B.S.
It's not a matter of what I think of creationism. You need to first prove the creator exist.
Science is evidence in which support it's theories.
Creationism is believing something that has no evidence.
http://godsfake.blogspot.com/
2007-06-29 12:21:24
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
the big bang is creation....it was an event that started this universe....and it's still expanding now....those elements are brought together or possibly spoken into existence.
2007-06-29 12:14:59
·
answer #8
·
answered by pissdownsatansback 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
earlier the speck, there replaced into no longer something. something won't be able to come from no longer something without a reason. the reason at the back of the universe had to have the flexibility of being interior of itself with the intention to create out of no longer something. The writer of the universe is referred to as God.
2016-10-19 04:37:48
·
answer #9
·
answered by prebor 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
creationism says quite simply that god poofed everything into existence.
yeah, i'll go with the big bang theory.
2007-06-29 12:18:34
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
God made Love to Mother Nature and so we call it The Big Bang Baby!
2007-06-29 12:14:22
·
answer #11
·
answered by YippyYahQQ 1
·
2⤊
2⤋