2007-06-29 09:54:31 · 14 answers · asked by Jason Bourne 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
A living thing that is evolving makes the most plausible sense to me.
2007-06-29 09:57:00 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
In order for something to evolve it must come from something! It makes more sense that we came from dust. Not to mention science has proven n most of the make up of a human does in fact come from the ingredients found in earth.
2007-06-29 17:00:13 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
A living thing evolving....which could have been originally planned and created by a higher source. Agree?
2007-06-29 16:59:17 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well the original living thing had to come from something.
Which makes more sense:
The Universe being created,
or just happening for no reason at all?
Just as Creationism seems ridiculous to those believing in evolution so does the Big Bang theory to me.
2007-06-29 16:59:12 · answer #4 · answered by RP 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
God's last acts of Creation was that God formed man and woman. First God created man's body. Everything was in place but it was lifeless. Next God, started man's heart, and lungs to function and man came alive. God was the source of life, although the material man was made of was lifeless matter of the earth it only became a "living being" when God put life into it. God breathed in man's nostrils the breath of life. The word breath is used in various ways in Scripture, Generally it means "spirit" which this seems to be what is meant here. God gave man the "spirit of life."
The word "soul" can be translated as "being." It is not referencing man's spiritual nature, but of his being alive. The word is used also in reference to animals, yet we know animals do not have a living spiritual soul as does man. Animals were not being created in God's image, having intelligence, will and emotion. Animals were created for the benefit of man as was all of Creation. (Genesis 1:28) Animals live by instinct rather than by their intelligence directed by their will. God programmed animals to function instinctively as they do. There is no Scripture that suggests animals will go to heaven. They will be apart of the Millennium, but are not mentioned in the New Heavens and Earth.
Theistic evolution that accepts the hypothesis of the evolution of man directed by God can not find support for their false ideas in the Genesis account of the Creation of man. The Biblical narrative states man was made personally by God from the dust of he earth. It does not say man came from an evolution of the family of primates (monkeys, apes, chimpanzees and etc). It states man was first created and then energized or made a living being. Man did not come from living matter but from inert material which was formed by special Creation of God and then given life.
2007-06-29 17:01:03 · answer #5 · answered by Brooke 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
What makes more sense?
Something coming from nothing, or a first cause that was always here?
By the way, evolution is the best argument FOR God. Most people just don't get it.
2007-06-29 17:00:31 · answer #6 · answered by Mystine G 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
but what did it evolve from in the first place there would be no live without God.
2007-06-29 16:59:41 · answer #7 · answered by Mim 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We actually have evidence of living things evolving. Case closed.
2007-06-29 16:57:19 · answer #8 · answered by ? 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
evolving more prof from evolving no prof form being made form dust
2007-06-29 16:59:33 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
A living thing made from dust(silicon-sand0 because the creativity goes without mention and without boundary. evolution is so bland.
2007-06-29 16:58:58 · answer #10 · answered by ConstElation 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋