The proof that oral tradition is Apostolic in origin is easily found by looking at authoritative sources other than the Bible, such as the writings of the early Church Fathers, the 2nd generation leaders of the original Christian Church, who received their teaching directly from the Apostles. Basic Christian beliefs such as the baptism of infants, the real presence of Christ's body and blood in the Eucharist, the sacrament of reconciliation, etc, are clearly and repeatedly described in their writings, demonstrating that such beliefs and practices were part of the normal life of the early Christian Church from the beginning. This is the reason Protestants avoid such historical documents, since many of their novel doctrinal ideas would be immediately invalidated by the facts revealed therein. If you are interested in seeing some examples of such Apostolic Tradition, you can find many here:
http://www.catholic.com/
.
2007-06-29 09:08:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by PaulCyp 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
The differences between Orthodoxy and Catholicism did not appear until the 6th Century AD - which had nothing to do with Apostolic Oral Tradition but a Synod in Spain concluding that the Holy Spirit came before the Father and the Son - not from the Father as in the Nicene Creed.
Once that heresy started to roll, others followed. The church fathers (Catholic and Orthodox) spent the entire 2nd and 3rd Century fighting heretics like Arius and so on....
The answer to your question is that there is no doctrine from the Apostles that the Bible is silent about. I'm sure what you're looking for exists in the other 41,998 Christian denominations.
2007-06-30 08:36:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
They differences are really minimal unless you are very partisan. There is quite a bit in the apostolic tradition which is not fully in the bible. For example, many Eastern Churches use the liturgy of the apostle James. Archaeologist date that liturgy at around AD 60. This is older than much of the New Testament. It isn't contrary to scripture, but it isn't part of it either.
The Thomas Christians, the Christians that were in Churches founded by the Apostle Thomas were separate from the rest of Christianity for over 1000 years because no one knew they existed. The Portuguese arrived in India to Christianize it only to find the Mass being sung as it was since the time of Thomas. They point out that Thomas was sent by Mary, following her Resurrection (what is taught as the Assumption in the Roman Church and the Dormition in the Eastern Church) and he made it to India and was eventually martyred there.
The Church of the Thomas Christians looks just like any of the other Churches of apostolic origins, with the apostolic succession, the mass, eucharist, Marian devotion etc., yet they were not part of Christianity until the time of the Reformation.
Assumption, dormition and Resurrection of Mary are all different ways of saying the same thing.
2007-06-30 13:50:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by OPM 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Are you certain you did not ask this so that you could get a rant from Zena E.I simply the day previous to this be taught 2 first-rate Greek Orthodox internet web sites explaining there ideals. After studying them there is no doubt and any individual who reads there website and teachings could agree Zena E is an extensive. The variants got here approximately additional over use of there respective languages and tradition than truly theological variants. But there are variations tho such a lot generally minor and will also be over come and if the 2 exceptional church structures have been to be one all over again there is no primary change that could adjust the reality of each. Here is one instance they the Orthodox do not coach in a Purgatory as Catholics admire it however they do educate that one must pray for the lifeless even the ones in Hell to make there time extra tolerable until the final Judgment. Catholics instruct Purgatory is the location the ones nevertheless unworthy of Gods presence and nevertheless have the stains of sin to pay for accomplish that in Purgatory which Paul describes as the fireplace of purification and we Catholics are to wish to make there time there less complicated or equipped to depart it faster. That is known as among the 2 as identical variants.An extra minor change is a Orthodox Priest can turn out to be a married Priest if Married earlier than becoming a member of the priest hood however as quickly as a Priest must keep Celibate and there Bishops have received to be Celibate,the Catholic Church field is what everyone knows within the western global as strictly a Celibate Priesthood except in certain occasions similar to a Married Lutheran Pastor Joins the Catholic Church and is legal into the Priesthood. Also inside the Orthodox Church while a little one is Baptized they're immersed 3 occasions and are confirmed on the Baptism,the Catholic Church Baptism will also be both by means of immersion or pouring and quite often via pouring and affirmation comes at a later age after ideas within the faith. Each have reputable plenty and Priesthood. We don't forget the Pope to be head of Christ Church they coach he is in primacy however satisfactory first among equals. So opposite to Zena E and her anti Catholic rants the Patriarch of the Greek Orthodox and the Pope have been running jointly for unification however taking it slowly so as to iron in the market variations with honest determining. I'm hoping this is helping you admire how instead little variants there are among the two.
2016-09-05 10:44:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by fogleman 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I will readily admit that i am not a theologian. I am not sure about doctrine which comes from tradition. A practice which comes from tradition is praying the rosary. The Rosary began as a Jewish tradition of reciting all 150 Psalms. The Christians shortened this to fifty Hail Marys repeated in a three-day cycle. The Rosary is not exactly in the Bible, but almost. It includes The Lord's Prayer, which is in the Bible, the Hail Mary, which is not exactly in the Bible but is very nearly word-for-word out of Luke and the Glory Be, which is not in the Bible to my knowledge.
Another practice which comes from tradition is applying ashes, which was a Jewish penance rite.
Not sure if this is what you are looking for but hope this helps.
2007-06-29 09:24:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by Adoptive Father 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
>>Can you please provide a single example of a doctrine that originates from an Oral Apostolic Tradition that the Bible is Silent about?<<
The Assumption of Mary.
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/02006b.htm
http://www.uoregon.edu/~sshoemak/texts/dormindex.htm
http://www.amazon.com/Ancient-Traditions-Dormition-Assumption-Christian/dp/0199210748/ref=ed_oe_p/103-1564026-3252645
2007-06-29 10:19:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I'm a devout Catholic but you went well over my head. That's one for somebody with a degree from a divinity school.
2007-06-29 09:05:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Great Question. Can't wait to see the answers.
Hopefully, someone with actual knowledge.
2007-06-29 09:02:26
·
answer #8
·
answered by TEK 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
In the Eastern Orthodox Christian Church - the one without the schisms, homosexual pedophiles, and gaudy Rolex watches - *everybody* goes to Heaven without exception or delay. Those who embraced God forever luxuriate in the infinite radiance of His inconceivable love. Those who denied God burn in it.
Everything else is footnotes and Accounts Receivable.
2007-06-29 09:08:32
·
answer #9
·
answered by Uncle Al 5
·
0⤊
3⤋
Wait for Evolver - he already mostly answered this in another question.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=ArJ5TsWhV7IW1lkwfpEJz5Dd7BR.?qid=20070629123854AApbKF4
2007-06-29 09:06:48
·
answer #10
·
answered by SpiritRoaming 7
·
0⤊
0⤋