What will you prefer Dining chair with armrest/without.?

Answer 1

Well, if you have a more decorative formal area, then I would say with arm rests. If it's more casual, then without.

Answer 2

The chairs with the arms are meant for the head of the table and usually there are two. I had a dining set that these arms did not slip under the table. They would bump into the table so I hated those chairs because no one could squeeze by me. I now have a new dining set and the arms slip under the table so it is not a problem for me, but check your chair and table out for this situation if you are buying a new set.. The chairs with arms are more costly and that is one reason people choose armless chairs.

Answer 3

That would depend on the design for me. A more homey, classic looking dining set --no arm rest
A larger, more expensive looking set, could have arm rests..ex: a marble top table with leather high back chairs.

Answer 4

Without.
Arms take up space and are hard to get out of when you have many guests crammed around your table.
When in doubt, go functional over looks.

Answer 5

well i like armchairs cause its got some place where u can put your arms (of course) but their bulky they can get in the way and they are heavy any ones without arms are lighter but, you have no where u can put your arms.

Answer 6

Without definetely.

Answer 7

1] the ones with arms are heavier
2] they take up more space
3] if you must by some with arms, use them at head and foot of table

Answer 8

without.
Too bulky with

Answer 9

W/O