English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

LOOK WHAT I FOUND!!!

2 Thessalonians 2:10-11 because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:

A LIE. (Funny how text books are still filled with lies (like gill slits in embryos. Proven wrong over 130 years ago when Haekel was convicted of fraudyulent drawings 'ontology recapitulates phylogeny)

But here is the best Jeremiah 2:27 "Saying to a stock, Thou art my father; and to a stone, Thou hast brought me forth:"

Doesn't evolution say that 4.5bya the earth formed a rocky crust and then it rained on the rocks for millions of years and turned them into a soupy ocean?!?!

Say to a stone, thou hast brought me forth... LOL!

2007-06-28 14:15:52 · 16 answers · asked by musingaloud 2 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

No I am showing that evolution says that rocks brought us forth and that is what the Bible says the people who turn their back will believe...I thought it was neat

2007-06-28 14:25:52 · update #1

16 answers

Yes that is what evolutionists believe " In the beginning dirt"
This is a great pun, but you do know that Jeremiah was talking about idols of wood and stone. You happened to just put your finger on the biggest problem evolutionists have . (the origin of life) They have no, none ,zip, zero, nada plausible theories on how the dirt came to life. The DNA in a single cell in the human body contains more written information than the entire 30 volume set of the Encyclopedia Britannica. This information tells the cell how to function, how to ,absorb food,convert it to energy, expel the wastes left over, replicate into one of a multitude of various types of cells in the body, and etc. This information had to have an author. When we see an animal depicted on the wall of a cave or a string of words written in a book we know that it had an intelligence behind it. The same must be true of DNA in every living cell in every living substance on earth. It is much too complex to be accidental. The mechanical ability of a single celled animal is amazing . Motors, propellers, complex operating mechanisms all in a single cell! It is called irreducible complexity. Again no accident. The same is true of the eyeball, so complex that it can not possibly be the result of random chance. Biology is really evidence for God, not evolution. Consider what Carl Sagan,famous atronomer/Atheist said: " The receipt of a single message from space ,would be enough to know there is intellegence out there." By analogy we can reasonably conclude that if a single simple radio message from outer space would confirm intellegent authorship and therfore intellegent life out there , we can be positively sure there is intellegent design/authorship behind the complexity of DNA, eyeballs and single cell animals. His name is G-d. Cap'n Arlo

2007-06-28 14:53:08 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Interesting, but you are trying to link two completely different topics!

"Doesn't evolution say that 4.5bya the earth formed a rocky crust and then it rained on the rocks for millions of years and turned them into a soupy ocean?!?!"

NO! Evolution deals with genetic and phenotypical changes caused by adaptations to the environment, between generations for an entire population of like organisms. Such changes may become evident in as few as 1 or 2 generations, or may take several thousand. The beginnings of these living organisms however is still a mystery. Scientists and theologists have many conflicting ideas on how the beginning of the world and how life itself may have arose, but Creation is entirely separate from Evolution. Consider rather, Evolution is a process that began after Creation.

There is some truth in your statement however - whether life rose naturally, or was created under devin influence, all life on earth is tied to the planet itself as we are made up of the same minerals, the same elements that make up rock, soil, air and water.

2007-06-30 04:39:56 · answer #2 · answered by gshprd918 4 · 0 0

THE Bible tells Christians to stick to interior the footsteps of Jesus, yet in the present day the religious fad is to path off after the scientists who replica Greek philosophers. interior the 5th century earlier Christ the Greek actuality seeker Empedocles believed in spontaneous era of existence, sluggish evolution of organisms and survival of the fittest. contained in right here century Aristotle taught that “guy is the optimum factor of one lengthy and non-end ascent.” Greek philosophers frequently preached the evolution thought. lined in Paul’s warning, at Colossians 2:8 (NW), against traditions may be the evolutionary philosophies of those babblers, who have been so smart of their own eyes and who mocked God’s awareness as foolishness: “look out: perchance there could be some guy which will carry you off as his prey for the period of the philosophy and empty deception in accordance to the custom of adult men, in accordance to the consumer-friendly problems with the international and not in accordance to Christ.” Christendom’s priests have been carried off by fact the prey of evolution. the classic Greeks ensnared many of their day; the admired scientists take captive via their awareness thousands and thousands in the present day, which incorporate many priests. Evolution is the club used to beat into submission people who as quickly as believed the Bible. like the classic Greeks, the scientists are the smart ones, they have the data, they stick to the medical technique. Any who do no longer accept as true with them by Bible checklist of creation are gullible ignoramuses. The proud clergy do no longer pick to be classed as gullible ignoramuses. so they fall prey to evolution.

2016-10-19 03:19:58 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Doesn't Genesis state the order in which things came with specific times? On the 6th day he created man... Sounds like a contradiction if you think it is talking about evolution.

2007-06-28 14:21:48 · answer #4 · answered by Magus 4 · 1 0

A better passage on that topic is 2nd Peter 3:1-7

But, yes I see the mindset prophesied in scripture.

2007-06-28 14:22:01 · answer #5 · answered by TEK 4 · 0 0

Good find. Read Romans 1:18 through 1:26 I believe. It could be a symbol for evolution as well.

2007-06-28 14:19:26 · answer #6 · answered by Me 4 · 1 2

So basically, you picked a bible verse, then tried to fit to your particular twisted opinion, make fun of others, then call yourself a loving Christian?

Edit: Perhaps I was a little too harsh, pick out any verse you want, translate it however you want, blah blah, but I still don't believe you.

Oh and as for the ontology claim of yours....
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/section2.html#ontogeny
Proof for it, and its not based upon drawings, but upon pictures of actual embryos. It also addresses the fact that Haeckel was wrong, but that doesn't disprove modern findings.

2007-06-28 14:18:45 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

Yes

2 Peter 2
1But there were also false prophets among the people, just as there will be false teachers among you. They will secretly introduce destructive heresies, even denying the sovereign Lord who bought them—bringing swift destruction on themselves. 2Many will follow their shameful ways and will bring the way of truth into disrepute. 3In their greed these teachers will exploit you with stories they have made up. Their condemnation has long been hanging over them, and their destruction has not been sleeping.

2007-06-28 14:19:48 · answer #8 · answered by Holy Holly 5 · 3 1

It's funny that you say that evolution says that 4.5 billion years ago... I'm sorry, evolution is basically just survival of the fittest... Read up on "Abiogenesis".

2007-06-28 16:04:57 · answer #9 · answered by Joe S. 3 · 2 0

Nope, I didn't see anything in that scripture about heritable genetic mutation leading to phenotypic differentiation resulting in improved chances of survival due to natural selection?

Got any more vague meaningless archaic scripture?

2007-06-28 14:19:29 · answer #10 · answered by Dark-River 6 · 5 1

fedest.com, questions and answers