Well, let's get them started
2007-06-28 12:04:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by ryoma136 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
nicely, there are some issues to assert right here. First, it somewhat is a word, not a term. 2d, only arguments could be valid, not words or words. the main problem with the words as used, notwithstanding, is that there are not any fundamentals of atheism. it somewhat is only a loss of concept in any deity. So, the term "fundy" only won't be in a position to notice. it variety of feels to be suggesting atheists could be forceful of their place the way non secular fundamentalists are. Even that i'm not confident of, in view that forcefully arguing for somebody to be existence like isn't comparable to forcefully affirming unsupported non secular positions like theism.
2016-10-03 06:36:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree it would be that.
No fundies will raise the average intelligence of this site remarkably.
2007-06-28 12:07:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Self respect is much easier to achieve, if a person's principles are flexible.
2007-06-28 22:46:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
That would be a great day.
There are so few honest theological discussions here.
2007-06-28 12:08:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by Dark-River 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Ah, dare to dream, my friend.. dare to dream.
2007-06-28 12:10:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by Kallan 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
but... where would I get my laughs then?
2007-06-28 12:49:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by Worzel Gummidge 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
WTF?
2007-06-28 12:05:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋