Should R7S bring in Tony Blair to mediate between the atheists and the Christians?

Question

R&S not R7S

Answer 1

more people get along then not behind the scenes,

in the past ive reached out to people ive disagreed with on here and just talked to them one on one

bridges have been built

we dont need some world leader

we all need to shut the heck up and stop with the petty bickering and malicious sarcasm, and admit why we are all here,

some to have fun myself included

but we're all together on this globe, together,

we all want whats best

once we all buy into the vision of unity and getting along we can explore our differences and similarities

do we have to draw some lines sure of course we do,

the three hot button topics in the category are abortion, evolution vs creationism, and gay marriage,

we're not stupid we know we arent congress or the supreme court

we know were just in here

but instead of trying to score points what if we all just asked rational questions

humor is of course needed to liven up the mood it cant be all serious

what if we all listened and learned about what the other person was saying

theres loads of religious people who dont want religion in the science classroom
and loads of evolution people who want to protect the rights of private education and home schooling to teach creationism

if wed all shut up for 10 minutes wed see theres more overlap of agreement then not

just wait 5 minutes and we'll see another round of atheists why are you in this category
and just wait tonight it will be another round of flying spaghetti monster

people ask original questions once in a while

the intelligent among us here have learned a great deal about other people different from ourselves

Answer 2

First, you're able to desire to settle on if the two facets have equivalent footing for their place, then you definately can settle on in case you're able to mediate, or if one ideology could be eradicated/outlawed. Atheists dont fly planes into homes. Atheists view the international with reason and good judgment. Atheists do what's perfect, by fact it rather is optimal and 'incorrect' movements reason human suffering. Theists do fly planes into homes. Theists already understand how the international works, and oppose any and all medical inquiry that opposes their ideology. If it werent for individuals pushing previous what the bible instructed them approximately he international, we would not have the Germ thought of affliction, and from that present day medicine which incorporate antibiotics(sure, faith as quickly as adversarial the GTD, claiming god led to affliction, and it replaced into his will and incorrect to oppose). Theists dont shelter a rational view of morality, they have 'absolute morality', which ignores human suffering and rather chooses morals in accordance with previous and repressive teachings. Atheism promotes good judgment and reason and serious thinking and making the international a extra valuable place faith promotes willful lack of understanding, homophobia, misogyny, intolerance and violence. So, think of approximately that when which come and tell me we could consistently supply the two facets equivalent time interior the communicate.

Answer 3

What, Phoney Blair!

Answer 4

Ooh, that'll solve the problem. After he converts to Catholicism or before?

Answer 5

I agree with Fokkerball & Captain Atheism.

Answer 6

A mediator is not what is needed.

What is needed is a better education system in this country. Then there wouldn't be any debate, because there wouldn't be any Christians.

Answer 7

I was thinking Adam Sandler or Bob Barker...Or Both?

Answer 8

I would like to see Rosie Odonnel do it. Much more exciting.

Answer 9

I'd rather have the Dalai Lama.

Answer 10

I lost alot or respect for him after he became Bush's lap dog.

He's not welcome here