WHINING IN NASCAR NEVER SEEMS TO WORK.... When Nascar is the ONLY game in town...you must play by their rules.... Excellent point !!!!
2007-06-28 00:56:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by edwardo 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Wow, comparing the powers that be at NASCAR to Hitler? That's a little harsh, don't you think? I would be interested in knowing what penalties you are talking about. In some sports if you break the rules or bring disgrace to the game you are thrown out forever. Some of these teams in NASCAR break the rules constantly. And the penalty is six weeks for the crew chief? Or one race parked for the team and driver? Doesn't sound very Hitler like to me.
2007-06-28 09:44:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
They have reduced penalties before; and even overturned some. The rule 20-2H which the 24 and 48 are accused of violating is a rule that was authored on June 22, 2007 in the evening. For those of you without a calender that was friday; when Jeff and Jimmie where prevented from practicing and qualifying.
Yes, NASCAR is rough when it comes to it's rules. It has ultimate authority and is accountable to no one. But, there have been moments when Teams have been able to convince NASCAR that they have gone too far; and penalties have been curtailed or even complete absolved.
2007-06-28 09:21:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by Gene L 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Teams dont appeal penalties to NASCAR, but to the National Stock Car Racing Commission. The commission is made up of 31 members and includes promotors, former owners, and officials from other racing series. The commission chairman is joined by two members, based on their knowledge and experience with the issue, to make a quorum. They hear arguments from both NASCAR and the team and make a decision.
There have been occassions were appeals were successful. Michael Waltrip had his fine and point penalty for an obscene gesture allegedly caught on tv rescinded because two of the commission members said the video was inconclusive. And crew cheifs Chad Knaus and Alan Gustofson had their suspensions lifted after appealing a penalty for height violations.
2007-06-28 08:49:54
·
answer #4
·
answered by mindcrime828 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well you are probably right that it won't do any good to appeal the punishments. However, unlike the other teams that have been punished, Hendrick has a pretty valid argument. No other driver had to sit out for practice and qualifying or start in the back. I know Jr. was caught in a prerace inspection, but they still allowed him to keep his original starting position for the race. The Hendrick guys got hit the hardest of any team so far for a COT infraction. So yes, the penalty will stand, but you can't blame them for trying because no matter what anybody says, making Jeff and Jimmie start from the back at Sonoma affected the race and added to the points penalty. They were lucky to get up as far as they did. Starting at the back at Sonoma could have been devastating to both of them. For that, they have a reason to try to appeal.
2007-06-28 10:07:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by Sir Bobber 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
ABSOLUTELY NOTHING !!!
Although it’s true that a suspended crew chief isn’t allowed to enter the Cup garage while serving his suspension, there’s been nothing done to stop the guilty party from attending races, where some have been spotted in such places as sponsor suites and even the motor coach lots. And if a “suspended” crew chief is on the property, what’s to keep him from conversing face-to-face with his crew and his driver during the course of a race weekend? Absolutely nothing.
Sure, conversations could just as easily take place today thanks to cell phones and even the Internet (“Hey, we just got an instant message from DAVID G. He says go up a couple of rounds on the sway bar!”). Unfortunately, there is no foolproof way NASCAR officials could police such activity. HEE HEE But it should be able to keep suspended competitors, regardless of their position on a team, off track property. Or at least appear to be doing so. A little effort on their part could go a long way.
As it currently stands, NASCAR seems to be simply ignoring the situation, turning the “suspension” portion of a ruling into nothing more than a joke.
KEEP THEM COMING NASCAR :)
2007-06-28 08:12:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by Shawn G 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
The idea is that while you are contesting the penalty the crew chief can still be at the track with his team. Yes this only delays the penalty.
2007-06-28 12:37:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by tsudrafter 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
You're right, but by doing it.. IF your crew chief is suspended.. Appealing the penalty would allow you to keep him for ONE MORE RACE before the suspension is started... Considering theres a race on the following weekend. That would be the only reason to do it I think, because you're right.. Their not going to overturn anything.
2007-06-28 10:50:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by Will-I-Am Hendrick Supporter 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
There are a few of those penalties that an appeal works. Knaus was penalized a few years ago and NASCAR lightened his sentence. I don't see the point, but you wouldn't try to not appeal a jail sentence would you???
2007-06-28 11:17:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by 24_gordon_24 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
H H you are so right. besides it is a private institution. they only answer to themselves. and this is their greatest downfall. I believe now is A GOOD time for a nonbiased reacing club to be organized. there are alot of race tracks now and some that can be revived. it would take a great leader. but I don't know who would do it.. maybe W could when he gets out of office..what do you think?
2007-06-28 08:37:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by spotlite 5
·
1⤊
0⤋