English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The Bible already been around 500 years before Islam. Moslems say that the Bible had been corrupted. How do you know it? All the historian (non Christian) at that time confirm Jesus had died.

If you follow Muhammad's order to believe Torah and Gospel you should accept that Jesus had died and resurrected.
The Bible today is the one that Muhammad had read.

2007-06-27 23:54:22 · 19 answers · asked by IcyCool 4 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

19 answers

Where would Islam be today if it accepted the resurrection and divinity of Jesus Christ?

Islam is a perverted version of Judaism and Christianity.

Peace and blessings!

2007-06-28 01:47:29 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

The Bible is not the one Muhammad read. If one believe in the bible then one should believe everything in the bible. The bible is the truth and not have truth. Muhammad and every one that lives according to the Torah believes that Jesus died but he did not resurrect. I can understand why alot of people and these people in this type of religion would believe that. They don't understand that Christians live in a different world. Not one physically but i mean spiritually. Did Muhammad die and rose agian or perhaps allah - (if it's spelled right.) The answer to that is NO. These are the same people that the prophet Elijah proved wrong when he said lets see whose God is the real God. And who lost, the prophet of baal. They all believe in the same things. There's No difference between them.

2007-06-28 08:29:41 · answer #2 · answered by BRE 1 · 0 0

"All the historian (non Christian) at that time confirm Jesus had died".

The above statement is incorrect. ALL of the information about Jesus takes place AFTER his lifetime, which means there is no first-hand evidence of Jesus ever having existed in the first place. This does not mean that there never was a Jesus, only that there is no first-hand evidence. In a court of law, second-hand testimony is known as "hearsay evidence", and is NOT allowed. History has to hold to the same standard.

As to the resurrection, the Roman Empire did NOT allow the victims of crucifixion to be removed from the crosses after they died. They were left there as a reminder to the local population that you do not disobey the orders of the Empire or this is what will happen to you. Therefore, if Jesus had never been buried, he never could have been resurrected. Also, the resurrection aspect of the Jesus story is taken from another religion - Christians weren't the first to come up with it, but Christians freely "borrowed" from other religions in order to gain converts.

At the Council of Nicea in 325 A.D. it was decided by commitee that Jesus was divine, that is, that Jesus was actually "God". Before this Jesus had only been honored as a prophet, but never worshipped as a god. The reason the Muslims deny that Jesus had died and resurrected is because they don't believe it ever happened, but there are plenty of holes in the "truth" in the Koran as well.

"The Bible today is the one that Muhammed had read".

Really? Which translation? You are making a statement that has no evidence for it. The English language wasn't even said to have come into its modern form until 1066, and by that time Muhammed had been dead for about 300 years.

2007-06-28 07:56:34 · answer #3 · answered by Paul Hxyz 7 · 0 1

Ok lets take a look at the verse in the Quran:

That they said (in boast), "We killed Christ Jesus the son of Mary, the Messenger of Allah";- but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear to them, and those who differ therein are full of doubts, with no (certain) knowledge, but only conjecture to follow, for of a surety they killed him not:-

Nay, Allah raised him up unto Himself; and Allah is Exalted in Power, Wise;- (Quran 4: 157-158)

The Quran does not deny, that people saw something that they thought to be the crucifixion, but it wasn't Jesus (pbuh) because God raised Jesus (pbuh).

The Bible is corrupt to which itself testifies:

" 'How can you say, "We are wise,
for we have the law of the LORD,"
when actually the lying pen of the scribes
has handled it falsely? (Jeremiah 8:8)

You can see changes being made to the Bible all the time, when you find older scriptures they are different to the ones we already had read the KJV and NIV Bible side by side you can see words that are missing for example "begotten"

KJV reads:
I will declare the decree: the LORD hath said unto me, Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee. (Psalms 2:7)

NIV says:
I will proclaim the decree of the LORD :
He said to me, "You are my Son ;
today I have become your Father. (Psalms 2:7)

You do understand that the word begotten give a whole new meaning to the verse, if the word begotten is the it means David is just like Jesus and therefore part of the god head. Which I'm sure you won't agree to, so you can see that the Bible is corrupted.

You also realise that the are many more Gospels that have not made it into the Bible for example Barnabus and Thomas. Barnabus says that someone else was crucified in Jesus (pbuh) place and I think Thomas says that when Jesus was on the cross one second and then the next was standing next to him laughing! So which Gospel is correct?

2007-06-28 07:27:26 · answer #4 · answered by By Any Means Necessary 5 · 2 1

My question is how do YOU know it ? Have you ever read the gosple of Barnabas ? He was one of the apostles of christ ; Luke speaks of him as a "good man" (11:24) . In Acts 14:14 , he is listed ahead of Paul , "Barnabas and Paul" instead of "Paul and Barnabas" !!
Barnabas denied jesus had died on the cross . how can you prove he's wrong or his gosple's been distorted ?
What you said about historians isn't credible at all , I think you're just repeatin' what you're told without any further researches .

2007-06-28 07:18:19 · answer #5 · answered by Perekletes 4 · 1 1

They are two different religions and beliefs. Atheists, Hindus, seeks, Buddhists, etc deny that Jesus was resurrected. Muslim is spelled with a U and a I.

2007-06-28 07:01:31 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Moslems are not Christians, so they are not bound by the same beliefs. As for the Bible being corrupted, it has been translated many times by many people, for their own benefit, not for the benefit of truth.

2007-06-28 06:59:23 · answer #7 · answered by Feeling new @ 42 4 · 2 1

Muslims never deny what was revealed to Prophet Jesus Christ (PBUH) from His Lord. We say the current Bible has undergone revisions after revisions. Many Christians accepts this that the Bible is human, though some, out of zeal which is not according to knowledge, 1 have denied this. Those books2 have passed through the minds of men, are written in the language of men, were penned by the hands of men, and bear in their style the characteristics of men.
Holy Quran is the final testment of God for the guidance of mankind.

2007-06-28 07:01:12 · answer #8 · answered by Ismail Eliat 6 · 3 4

Yes we believe Torah and Gospel( the orginal ones) But we also believe in Quran which says that Jesus was not crucified !!

Quran 004.157
That they said (in boast), "We killed Christ Jesus the son of Mary, the Messenger of Allah";- but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear to them, and those who differ therein are full of doubts, with no (certain) knowledge, but only conjecture to follow, for of a surety they killed him not:-

2007-06-28 07:13:06 · answer #9 · answered by ★Roshni★ 6 · 1 1

I feel most moslems are not so stupid as to deny Jesus' death or believe he has resurrected, since it's scientifically proved false

2007-06-28 07:08:11 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers