Regardless your religious belief, if useing the scientific method we can not prove that God made the human being, is this a valid topic of discussion for the public school science class?
2007-06-27 05:02:38 · 17 answers · asked by ? 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
If using the scientific method shows this and the evidence vetted verified through the normal peer review procedures required to make new science into teachable fact, then the answere is yes absolutely.
Any science minded person should say yes to this question because we know it ain't happening.
2007-06-27 05:11:45 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Did you mean to say "if using scientific method we CAN prove that God made the human being"? Because how you stated it isn't hypothetical and the other is. If that's what you meant, then I would say, yes, it should be included as much as you would include Darwin's theory if it is proven. And if that's the case, prayer in schools should be reastabolished, too. lol
2007-06-27 12:08:16 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I learned many such myths in school. I think it's part of a course of study in literature and anthropology. I think it even has relevance to basic science class - "Students, what's wrong with the Hopi creation myth, that man's spirit came from the sipapu?" It's not a slam on the story at all, it's just showing that the scientific method cannot use the myth if it cannot be proven and has no implications.
2007-06-27 12:11:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes it should. Any time religion is debated among free thinkers people realize how delusional it all is. Therefore helping to dissolve religion from society. Which in turn will allow mankind to progress further without the constraints of an imaginary dictator.
2007-06-27 12:09:02 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
A scientific hypothesis must be capable of being proved wrong. This does not meet that criterion, so it doesn't rise to the level of science, but mere speculation.
Indeed MOST scientific hypotheses are eventually disproved. That's the glory of science.
- {ââ} - {ââ} - {ââ} -
2007-06-27 12:07:39 · answer #5 · answered by NHBaritone 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
the scientific method does not prove evolution or big bang or anything like that. We all have the same evidence. If one idea about how it should be interpreted is presented in the classroom, other ideas should also be presented equally IMO.
2007-06-27 12:08:04 · answer #6 · answered by Michelle M 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, not at all in science, more like a world religion class/philosophy and ethics class.
Science is rigorous, detailed and dynamic.
2007-06-27 12:09:38 · answer #7 · answered by Tsumego 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes
2007-06-27 12:05:40 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
It was originally
ironically in New England the main reason to start school was to teach the Bible
2007-06-27 12:06:54 · answer #9 · answered by Noble Angel 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well, under that assumption, "god" should be a part of science, history, math, ummm everything else too, just like in xian school.........hey.......wait a minute........deja vu. YIKES, no no no more xian school for me, thanks. *retreats to corner and starts rocking in a fetal position from memories of isolation in a private xian school*
2007-06-27 12:26:13 · answer #10 · answered by RealRachel 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋