If you answered yes is there any simialarity to what was done in Iraq with Saddam Hussain.
2007-06-26 21:05:55 · 11 answers · asked by Tooly 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
i think that if i the chance i would kill him as an infant that is before he even got to the German parliament i would do the same with Saddam as he killed many innocent people just as Hitler did!!!!
2007-06-27 01:42:53 · answer #1 · answered by dodgie dave 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Doc Brown and I are already working on that
The fact of the matter is that Saddam already had his holocaust in the 80's and early 90's. The PKK and the PDK have gained to much influence for that to happen to the Kurds again, additionally, according to the Lancet report anywhere from an estimated 392,979 to 942,636 people have died from the war in Iraq. The Iraq Study Group estimated that 3,000 people die each month as a direct result of the war. Enough to be considered an unintentional holocaust
In all reality the way this war was being handled originally was America was just doing Irans dirty work, now Iraq is ripe for the picking
I'm saying this as someone who supports the war in Iraq.
Also, if I had a time machine, I'd go back to the depression, invest heavily in Ford or follow Jesus/Muhammed around like the Papparazzi.
2007-06-26 22:48:27 · answer #2 · answered by Jon 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Did you know that there was once someone worse than Hitler?
There was and his name was Nebuchadnezzar and he killed and tortured more people in worse ways than Hitler.
He lived in the biblical days in a city named Babylon which is located in Iraq.
One of the ways he fancied tormenting people was to kill their children in front of them then take out their eyes so the last thing they would ever see was their children being killed.
Everyone lived in mortal fear of him and for good reason.
If anything they did or said bothered Nebuchadnezzar in the slightest they paid for it dearly and he was a very moody person.
So actually all three have allot in common with the only exception being that Nebuchadnezzar praised God the most high and acknowledged his existance.
Daniel chapter 3 verse28
But to kill them so as to prevent them from killing others I can't really say.
I would have to give that one some serious thought.
Because if I were to kill them before they had a chance to do anything wrong wouldn't that make me a monster as well?
Or by not killing them when given the chance to I'd be allowing them to go on to murder so many innocent people?
I'd have to sleep on that one and get back to you about it in the morning.
2007-06-26 21:40:16 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes I would. There is an agreement not to target foreign leaders for assassination. I do not believe in that idea.
Why is it considered immoral to kill the person responsible for the war but perfectly acceptable to kill primarily young men.
I do not see the similarity; Saddam was not assassinated. He was executed after a trial. The soldiers who gave their live (for a noble cause) were not given that option.
2007-06-26 21:25:29 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Personnaly I would'nt because i know this sounds odd but alot of good has come out of it such as all the people that had met in the camps that otherwise wouldnt of met and if you did go back and kill him youd be changing the world and you wouldnt even know if it was for the better.
Plus he cant be held responsible for his actions as modern day investigations have shown us that he wasnt exactly fine in the had and had many mental problems.
Just so you know I dont support what he did in any way but the guy had serious problems and i know im possibly going to get loads of thumbs down for this but i feel sorry for him knowing that it wasnt exactly his own fault.
2007-06-26 22:05:26 · answer #5 · answered by Krayden 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
You'd have to have the wisdom of Solomon to answer that question! You could make things worse. If you could know in advance what would happen I would go back and take out Harry Truman for establishing israel, what a putz he was!
2007-06-27 00:37:45 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
didn't you play command and conquer: Red Alert? An unchecked Stalin Would invade Europe, nearly crushing the Allies. Not that that would make me sad now.... jk
2007-06-26 22:00:19 · answer #7 · answered by B C 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, there would not be a history Channel then.
Wait, Maybe, Then I would be on the history channel as the man who took out hitler.
I hope when You said Take out, you meant kill him, becasue I definetely won't date him, even if he wore that cute french maid outfit of his.
2007-06-26 21:25:07 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
We'll know the real answer to this question in 50 years.
Personally, I think you're absolutely correct.
2007-06-26 21:24:44 · answer #9 · answered by ? 6 · 6⤊ 0⤋
Yep! Great question! But of course people will say no just to be stubborn.
2007-06-26 23:05:49 · answer #10 · answered by Just me 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋