English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

He seems like the only one who uses higher thinking skills instead of repeating information that the government has tried to pass as "fact".

2007-06-26 10:28:36 · 5 answers · asked by specialtygasket 3 in Environment Other - Environment

5 answers

Is that your other account?

2007-06-26 10:50:27 · answer #1 · answered by Marianne D 7 · 3 0

Hahaha Marianne - nice.


Let's see if I've got this right - you think global warming is some big hoax based on "common sense" or what Rush Limbaugh tells you. You read one global warming question where the only person who agrees that global warming is some big hoax is Andy C. Therefore since you agree with Andy C, you conclude that he must be the only person who can think for himself.

I'm curious - do you consider basing one's conclusions on scientific evidence to be equivalent to "repeating information that the government has tried to pass as 'fact'"?

You have no idea what people have based their conclusions on. To assume that people who disagree with you can't think for themselves is stupid and childish. Grow up.

2007-06-26 11:35:35 · answer #2 · answered by Dana1981 7 · 0 0

If out of all the thousands of Y/A members, you have only found one person who thinks for themselves, I don't know what to tell you, because most of the people who post here do have their own opinions.

If you are asking questions needing a factual answer, then it seems fitting to reference a "fact" sheet.

2007-06-26 10:41:56 · answer #3 · answered by Wood Smoke ~ Free2Bme! 6 · 0 0

I don't rely on information that might be spun. EVER
I try to be green to help out things like cleaner rivers, and not having trash or broken glass or the like, in places where my dog could walk.

2007-06-26 12:48:38 · answer #4 · answered by Ty 3 · 0 0

Thinking for yourself doesn't make what you think true.

2007-06-26 15:48:38 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers