Out spoken and over the top. These two could draw skepticism trying to explain the earth is round.
Asset or liability?
2007-06-26 07:06:39 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Civic Participation
Rosie O'Donnell and Michael Moore are liabilites for 9/11 truth - especially Michael Moore. I don't trust Moore because he seems like he will say anything controversial to promote his movies, although I do think his movies are great.
I applaud Rosie for coming to the side of truth, but because she has been a staunch Democrat in the past so that makes her a liability because she makes would be Republican truthers think that 9/11 Truth is some kind of "looney left" issue. It's totally untrue and the people that think this only watch the mainstream news. Of course you know this already.
Alex Jones is the wild card. I like him, he's got great info, but I can only take his radio show in intervals. To the liberals, he's going to be too religious and conservative, to the conservatives, he's going to be a wacko leftist. A lot of hardcore truthers diss AJ because he doesn't bring up the obvious Israeli implications of the crime, and then there are a lot of people in the movement just don't trust him because he hawks a lot of merchandise.
But for those in the know, he's the Don of the truth movement. His movies are hard hitting and are good activist tools. I prefer to read his websites than listen to the radio show and I always check out his sources. I'd recommend getting a Prison Planet membership for anyone.
2007-06-26 07:24:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
In a time where media is so overwhelming with ALL propaganda I think we need to take all info in and filter it ourselves. Alex Jones has alot of interesting points that make sense but like anyone that feels strong about their point of view they tend to scream instead of talk. And he does have a plethora of information which takes time and an open mind to take in but we are pumped by free media all day and we are conditioned to believe everything is what it is but there are some real, big money, shady sh*t going on.
Rosie is just echoing views and certain things from a movement that has a point but gets lost in her discussions. She gets the facts out there but in such a way no one even cares and she makes herself and those points, pointless.
Alex Jones- Assest
Rosie O'Donnell- Liability
2007-06-26 16:45:20 · answer #2 · answered by Augustus Seemore 2 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Liability
Anyone who has such narrow-minded ideas and then have people listen to them in sound bytes are liabilities. If these people could make their points without trying to get everyone in a up-roar then they would be more of an assest than liabliity. They need to acknowledge that their are two sides and a very grey area. I like people to voice their opinions, voice them not shout them, and not to make up things with "Artistic license" and can not listen to the other point of view or give it merit where merit is do, they are a LIABILITY to everyone not just their cause/party.
2007-06-26 17:59:49 · answer #3 · answered by Sarelda 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Rosie is not quite a liability, she gets a little too excited when
making her point. Like her!! Don't know much about Alex.
2007-06-27 20:48:52 · answer #4 · answered by jobo38 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Alex Jones rules!
2007-06-26 14:13:20 · answer #5 · answered by samhillesq 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
You're talking about the whole crackpot notion that there were no hijacked airliners, explosives were used, Bush knew, etc.? There's no one supporting that who's NOT a black sheep to some degree.
2007-06-27 06:07:40 · answer #6 · answered by gunplumber_462 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
I like them both
2007-06-26 22:14:16 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Looking at this from an unbiased point of view. I would have to say asset.
2007-06-26 14:17:25 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
BOYCOTT ROSIE
2007-06-29 02:20:06 · answer #9 · answered by Sweet Tea & Lemons 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋