Are you disbelievers of the 9/11 truth movement aware of all the misdirection and misinformation?

Question

Well put together videos have surfaced claiming that the 9/11 truth seekers believe no planes were used in the attacks. I would like to know who produced these videos.
I believe they were created in an attempt to discredit the movement. What it does do is confuses people between no planes at all and the fact that no plane hit WTC building #7. Many questions surround flight 93 as well. Not if there was a plane but if it crashed or was shot down. Again flight 77 has a great deal of interest surrounding the inconsistencies of a plane that sizes making the necessary maneuvers as well as the lack of damage.

No plans:
I have never heard any truth seekers that used this argument. I believe those who do are either unintentionally re posting what was sent to them or they are in the category of tin foil hat wearing fruit cakes. Similar to all those Americans that went out and bought duct tape and plastic sheeting.


One example of many non supported yet reagulary attacked theories.

Ask about the attack of 9/11 and a common response is. "I bet you think we didn't land on the moon either."
I feel people just brad others and pass final judgment without further analysis.
Another quick response people give, "I witnessed planes hit the building", or "Screw loose change", or some other belligerent response that has no relevance whatsoever.
Are people in such denial they refuse to look at the facts? Or do they simply assume they know what others think without looking at the substance?

Is that a joke? the next time I get a link to popularmechanics when I said nothing that is covered by popularmechanics I am going to block them. What the hell is wrong with you?
IF YOU WANT INFO SEND ME AN EMAIL AND I WILL GIVE YOU WHAT EVER YOU WANT. and dont worry I know a lot more about popularmechanics and the rest of the crap than you.

Answer 1

I have heard the theory that a plane did not hit the Pentagon, that the hole was not big enough, and that officials confiscated pictures, etc. There was even a picture on the Internet supposedly proving this to be true. Whether it was doctored or not, I don't know.

I have also heard that some people believe that the World Trade Center buildings were not only hit by planes, but the holocaust was helped along by explosives left in the buildings. These people claim that the plane fuel just could not take down the buildings and that the buildings "imploded" in a way that was almost professional.

How does one know the truth? Sometimes truth is never told. I do know that President Bush received up to eleven messages, in his Presidential Briefings, while he was vacationing in Texas. These messages warned of an imminent attack on American soil, and it was believed they would take place in New York.

According to George Tenet in his book, he wrote that he went to Texas to personally give these messages to Bush and warn him of the danger. Bush, he said, simply shrugged and changed the subject. Read the book. Tenet was head of National Security at that time, and he is furious about the furor over his "It's a slam dunk, Mr. President!" remark.

There are always conspiracy theories and perhaps none of us knows the truth or ever will know the truth. But a government that can use American citizens in a syphilis experiment or in mind-altering drug experiments, or one that can release poisonous gases over San Francisco, in an action unknown to the Frisco authorities or citizens...might just be capable of anything.

Answer 2

Sadly, so much "facts" have been laced on the internet that as curious as I was, find that anything can be distorted / falsified if wanted to bad enough. (Good old Ollie!). Any way, the bottom line, one "fact" can be misinformed and therefore, a hypothesis becomes wrong and leads to a false theory.

Could our governmet pull this off? Sure.
Could a terrorist group pull it off? Sure.

Maybe what ought to be considered is what is the probability of these events happening being caused by each avenue and then ignore the guesses and go by clear facts that everyone can agree on. But sadly also, I don't think its as simple as that. Economics, with terror has to be considered, and facts drawn from that, not speculation may also shed some light. But again, with i's dotted and t's crossed, it could contain misguided information that could lead to a false accusation.

P.S. Ever see the one about the Brits broadcasting WTC7 collapsed when it was still standing? LOL. again, whats the facts and whats speculation? Remove the guesses and go with the facts. The question is, what is clearly the facts?

P.S.S. Here is what I thought at the very beginning (after absorbing the "plane" attacks, failed and successful). How hard would it be for someone to get to Manhattan Island by boat and set off a nuke? If something like this happened, it would be blind lust for us for revenge and the government, if they were really that determined to go after another country, could use that to their full advantage. Are there disadvantages over this? Why would the government choose building attacks instead of nuke attack? Why would a terrorist group not want to try this if money is coming at them hand over fist? If they want us to be afraid, a big old mushroom cloud would surely do it. Thus the "on the fence" attitude that I have today over the whole thing. Foolish maybe, but the thought has always troubled me. Personally, I have the troubled suspicion that this is the Phantom Ship sinking that put us into Vietnam. Northwood is definitely a strong argument as well.

Answer 3

I can't believe people actually think that what they saw on that day did not happen the way it did, it is inexcusable for some rogue idiots to be spreading lies like this. Oh here's a hint, you know why WTC 7 was not hit, it was only 50 stories tall against two 110 story buildings, no plane could have hit it. They would have had to drop a bomb. Why did it catch fire, gee do you think aviation fuel falls? And why did it collapse later, lets see damage from the collapse of the other two towers and a well made building. You never hear the idiots use common sense do you.

Answer 4

Here is my theory, you dumbasses say that Bush is dumb
and yet you give him credit to be able to pull off this
horrendous act.

Two freaking planes flew in to the WTC and in case you
have been smoking to much dope to remember, Osama
tried to bomb the WTC in 1998, he thought that it would
tumble down then. The CIA warned Clinton in 1996 that
they had found credible evidence that Al Qaeda was
planing on using planes to attack skyscrapers in NY.

Of course Clinton did not do a damn thing about that, yet
9 months after bush takes over you all make a big deal
about how he did nothing.

Answer 5

I reply: I am aware of much misdirection and misinformation. However the disbelievers of the 9/11 truth movement still trust the state, and are unlikely to acknowledge the wizard has been located, hidden in plain view.

Answer 6

To my ever lasting horror, I saw those planes go into the World Trade Towers. Is eye witness testimony irrelevant?

Answer 7

Hey Matt,I see you really series & interested about
9/11 theories and I did very carfully study the matter with a detective eyes and I always come to the same conclsion,especialy when you add the power and the technology that we have over a bunch of caveMen !
But there's something about (9/11) reminds me
about another military covert operation was suggested by the pentegan generals to (JFK)
during the Cuban missiles crisis and it was rejected back then.may be you should read it
yourself and make up your mind.
Google : operation Northwood.

Answer 8

Without stating the obvious popular mechanics and Purdue Univ simulation disproving anything but the planes hitting the Twin Towers,


I have never had one "truth seeker" answer why Pres Bush would blow up some of his biggest financial supporters... The corporations with all the cash.

Why would he jeopardize any future election contributions?

Answer 9

Conspiracies and theories about 9/11 are all presumptions. Obviously, Al Qaeda was responsible for the attacks.

Answer 10

I'm with you Matt, I know it all and then some, too bad you can't make people think for themselves, they have to rely on what they are told is the truth, and make fun of people who do think, "sheeple" can't be expected to know any better. Brainwashing is perfectly obvious on here in all catagories!