For the record, I have never been to Peru:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/livescience/20070625/sc_livescience/giantancientpenguinslikedithot
You can say carbon 14 is flawed, but there are over 200 methods of radio metric dating that all say the same thing. How do you explain that news like this is consistently reported in world wide media?
2007-06-25 18:05:55 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
X theist: is it 155? If so, I stand corrected.
2007-06-25 18:13:13 · update #1
D.) its a 30 millions year old giant penguin fossil
2007-06-25 18:09:22 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋
It could be a giant penquin from a warm climate, God created a huge variety of creatures. There where giant creatures of all types before the flood that did not survive. God can bring them back as there are still penquins and each creature can give rise to it's own kind no matter the size. But it is amusing how they made the statement that it LIKELY used it large beak to gulp down large amounts of food to obtain such a large size. When my dog eats large amounts of food, it doesn't get bigger except in girth.
2007-06-25 18:33:58 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
think of it this way its gods joke
tell me why didnt it evolve [indeed why havnt penguins ''evolved]
carben dating depends on the rate of decay
to be a reliable measure it must stay out of the sun
what did penguins ''evolve'' from?
the whole evolution thing is sus ,horses were once rabbit size [yet they were still horses]
how come crocks are still the same [etc]
moluscs havnt ''evolved'' indeed many fossils [but for the extincted ones] confirm they remain the same [not confirming evolution at all ;in so far as change [evolution]
still people refuse to see gods little jokes
science cant even make life , yet profess to know how it evolved ,get science to be believable , get them to create one ''new'' life [use thier own dust.]
or evolve even one ''new'' creation
show how darwins finches confirm evolution [all were yet finches] ,even the darwin turtles were yet turtles ,show the evolutionary steps can breed [interbreed] the base step mutations ''scami trysts '' [scian trysts] claim evolved
2007-06-25 18:39:04 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Chuck Norris put them there and if you disagree The Almighty Chuck will round house kick you in the face
2007-06-25 20:39:18 · answer #4 · answered by Naemr Radbodson 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
d) none of the above.
But it does appear to be the fossil of one big penguin.
2007-06-25 18:13:50 · answer #5 · answered by Wondering 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
d. None of the above. You did not provide the correct answer in your multiple choice, which means that this is a trick question.
2007-06-25 18:12:58 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Huh.
Is the work of the Flying Spaghetti Monster.
2007-06-25 18:14:43 · answer #7 · answered by Lost. at. Sea. 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Don't be ridiculous, everyone knows that the atheists are under contract with satan to bury fossils... =P
So the answer is... d.) all of the above
2007-06-25 18:12:15 · answer #8 · answered by ♥Mira♥ 5 · 6⤊ 1⤋
How do you know it's 30 million years old? Were you there?
*sarcasm*
;)
Edit:
155, Satan induced me to write that.
2007-06-25 18:10:03 · answer #9 · answered by X Theist 5 · 6⤊ 0⤋
Yep it's the work of Satan again...lol always running around throwing bones here and there like a maniacal paperboy.
2007-06-25 18:12:23 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 1⤋