English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

11 answers

Flying at night.

Most people fly during the day, which usually means more flights, higher traffic, and ultimately greater congestion around airports. Planes burn an enormous amount of fuel as they are circling to land.

At higher altitudes, jet engines become more efficient, plus they can often adjust this altitude to reap benefit from the jet stream depending on where they are flying. You get none of those benefits as your circling to land.

Plus, you're less likely to get caught in auto traffic when you land at night.

2007-06-25 18:31:46 · answer #1 · answered by 3DM 5 · 1 2

"The ice age existed. all and sundry is of an identical opinion on that. The ice age ended. no one has asked the way it ended... if in simple terms sooner or later POOF each and every thing grow to be heat? Or, did a delicate warming reason the ice age to end? human beings could desire to no longer have brought about the top of the ice age." yet all of us know what did, Keith P is going over what got here with regard to the way a skeptic could (an somewhat skeptic, no longer a claimed skeptic that in simple terms denies the reality of world warming). in case you probably did no longer understand that the hardship-loose reason is that all of us know whilst each and all of the organic cycles take place and it in simple terms so occurs that we're not in a warming cycle (and there hasn't been any correlation with image voltaic activity for a on an identical time as the two) "What actual data is there that human beings are inflicting worldwide warming? Freon is heavier than air, so it sinks and by no potential reaches the ozone." different than for there basically be a tangential relation between the hollow interior the ozone layer and worldwide warming the CFCs do very a lot attain the stratosphere because of the fact the stratosphere is interior the heterosphere the place the atmospheric gases are properly blended by utilising atmospheric turbulence (and this is sufficient to get issues a ways heavier than CFCs as much as the turbopause). yet think of what you're asserting, CFCs are heavier then air, so is carbon dioxide so which you're able to anticipate CO2 to sink and sort a layer of CO2 on the floor upon that's the layer of molecular oxygen after which the layer of nitrogen after which the layer of atomic oxygen. that's in simple terms no longer how the ambience is under a hundred km.

2016-10-03 03:26:31 · answer #2 · answered by rambhul 4 · 0 0

Tough call...

In the daytime, the sun will be out, causing the plane to use more energy on the A/C.

At nighttime, the plane will have to use its headlights because it's not light out.

My opinion is to travel first thing in the morning, as soon as it's light out. You'd probably beat rush hour traffic, too, reducing emissions a bit on the way to the airport.

2007-07-02 08:44:44 · answer #3 · answered by wi_guy 2 · 0 0

The jury is still out on this one. An effect was measured after 9/11reduced air traffic. But it was a one time thing and no one is convinced its significant (200% error). And unless someone wants to shut down all air traffic again, we may never know.

The dataset is just too small for a conclusion.

One thing that was found to be very significant was the effect of the reduction of dumping raw semi-burned jet fuel and exhaust into the high atmosphere. That DID help!

2007-06-25 15:44:36 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

If and when you fly it should always be by mechanical energy thereby removing the threat of pollution. Just take an old bicycle, put extended wings on your arms to flap up and down and begin pumping your way into the heavens.

2007-07-02 06:08:57 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

When you fly is irrelavent. It's questionable whether the emissions from jet engines are at all a significant factor anyway, so fly away. The most significant thing you could do to reduce global warming is to ask the volanoes of the world not to erupt and the lightning-related forest fires not to burn, and the sun not to vary in its output.

2007-06-25 14:43:24 · answer #6 · answered by squeezie_1999 7 · 0 3

In these matters I suggest following the money trail.
The same people who are profiting out of causing the problems are profiting from the hysteria
I would have to say that it is cyclic
Follow the money trail
the Mega-Rich are pushing both barrows

did you hear the one about the Irish expedition to the sun?
they went at night

2007-06-25 22:56:39 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

It's better to fly during the day so the contrails can reflect some of the sunlight.

2007-06-25 14:29:41 · answer #8 · answered by Dana1981 7 · 1 1

I only fly on days with a solar or lunar eclipse. It can be hard to live with this schedule though. It will be another six months before I can fly home.

2007-06-27 18:25:08 · answer #9 · answered by deenerzz 3 · 0 2

Better to stay home or walk where your going

2007-06-25 14:34:58 · answer #10 · answered by teddybear 3 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers