Really "cute" how you make a joke out of these two very important issues.. Especially 9/11.
The insurgents in Iraq are terrorists. They are killing innocent civilians just as surely and just as ruthlessly as their allies in London.
It cannot be denied that the present war in Iraq is part of the global war on terror. Indeed, it is that war's central front. Not only because there are so many terrorists in Iraq, but because, as Abu Musab al-Zarqawi has acknowledged, creating a successful democracy in Iraq will be the beginning of the end for jihadist terrorists worldwide.
2007-06-25 06:20:20
·
answer #1
·
answered by ☆Bombastic☆ 5
·
2⤊
3⤋
If you R stupid enough to ask this question r U stupid enough to take the criticism. No one but Iraq did 911. Grow up people. When U have lived on this earth a long time then u will know you r listening to ignorant people. Bush is a God fearing man and he or any one else would do such a horrible thing. Hey maybe U did it, right U didn't.What I said about U made as much since in what u said about President Bush.
2007-07-01 05:54:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by Charla C 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Those who want the White House in the next election have been calling Bush stupid since the day he got in office...and working day and night to tear down any credibility he has had.
And there is no evidence he is a stupid man. And one of these days the "non-existing" chemical weapons are going to show up....hopefully not in our backyard....because so far no one has bothered much to keep searching for them.
What really gets them mad is that Bush has run such a "tight ship" that they can't get any leaks or find a way to totally get him out of office....these same people would love to do so.He demands total loyalty among those he hires...and they don't give info to the media....and no matter what they do to try to tear down Vice President Cheney.....he was the best decision Bush ever made. He is miles ahead of their opponents...and they know it.
I don't think Bush has done everything right....but he has tried to keep the terrorists away....he did act...and his mistake was listening to some super "idealists" who genuinely think they can "export" democracy to every nation who doesn't have it.
After all "those people deserve to have it".
What they don't realize is having a democracy is only won by fighting for it....that's how we got it....and we can't do it for anyone else.
So his real weak point was listening to advice from these people.
I also don't agree with him on immigration....and have always known he is on the wrong side of that issue.
But I'll take any day a President who isn't swayed by the "polls"....many of them "doctored"......who sticks to his guns about what he believes is the right way for the country.
And no, he isn't perfect....but so far I've heard nothing but what isn't right....but no suggestions of any better alternative.
I think Bush's enemies hate it that he has integrity. That's why they scream so loud!
We will get out of Iraq at the best time...and then will have to let that country sink or swim. Right now I think the more terrorists we kill there, the better for us!
2007-07-03 01:36:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by samantha 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
The question is inherently flawed. I'm a big critic of the Bush administration, but you're saying he's "stupid" to carry out the greatest conspiracy in civilzation. Thousands of people would have to be in on it. People who have spent their whole lives working in law enforcement to protect the citizens would suddenly roll over to a guy many of them don't like.
It's also assume the federal government knows how to flush a toilet. And as a former employee of the feds, is just absoluetely false. There's just no possible way it was a conspiracy with not a soul leaking to the press. It's human nature to question what we see, but that's just preposterous. And it's often times hard to think of being vulnerable as many other cities are much closer to the danger zone in the mideast. Why do you think the Afghans aren't mounting a massive insurgency like the Iraqi's, just leftover military elements. Their country had been taken over as a means to end a civil war and subsequently brought war upon them from a foreign power.
2007-06-25 13:28:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by rampantbaboon 1
·
3⤊
0⤋
I think Iraq was a terrible mistake. All these people on here who say Iraq wasnt werent there fighting the war. How do you fight suicidal bombers, thats why you nuked japan in ww11. Any military analyst should understand that someone who can wear plain clothes with a bomb strapped on themselves can not be beaten in war, they are already beaten and are gonna kill you. Ask the soldiers, only the ones to proud will say they did any good in iraq. Its as bad as vietnam. Bush didnt understand that these people hate americans, they are uneducated and stupid and dont realize they could be one of the richest countries in the world.
911 had nothing to do with bush no matter what micheal moore says, hes a fat sack of crap trying to sell movies, he makes them controversial and they sell.
Did any of you warlords ever think of all the starving and poor people in your country, how could the billion dollars a day bush's war cost be better spent then trying to save some crazy third world country.
2007-06-30 22:58:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by cndtroops1 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Anything is possible, especially since Al Qaeda was 'stupid' enough to blow up the world trade center buldings, part of the pentagon and a field in SW PA, after hijacking four US airliners -- killing all the passengers and crew in the process.
The threat from Radical Islam is real. You should walk a mile in Bush's birkenstocks before calling him stupid. His SAT was 1200. He went to Harvard and Yale and can pilot a jet plane. Casualties in this war are extremely low by any historical standard. But the leftists control the media.
2007-06-25 13:24:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by LibReformer 2
·
4⤊
1⤋
It's been whispered that, like Pearl Harbor and JFK--along with other historic tragedies before it--we KNEW 9/11 was forthcomming. High level law enforcement political dynamics existant between ranks of the CIA, FBI and the White House caused those lives to end.
2007-06-25 13:22:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by Mr. Wizard 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
I doubt it, although 9-11 was terribly convenient for the Bush administration falling polls and the neocons call for a new Pearl Harbor.
I'm not a conspiracy nut and I doubt that we killed our own people, but I personally think the official story stinks to high heaven. We are being lied to about something.
2007-06-25 13:29:01
·
answer #8
·
answered by damnyankeega 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Bush did Iraq? My, he was a busy boy and homosexual. Find it hard to believe he " did " a date on the calendar. Now he might have " done it" on 9\11. If he did I hope it didn't interrupt him.
2007-06-25 13:37:41
·
answer #9
·
answered by grumpyoldman 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Nothing stupid about going to Iraq. Saddam had to be expelled and the WMDs had to be found and it was all done. Only cowards think it was stupid.
2007-06-25 13:48:50
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋